Bannon v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1995
Neutral Citation1995-1109 HCA A,[1995] HCA 27
Date1995
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Conway v R
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Baker v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 August 2012
    ...— Co-accused made certain admissions in police interview and to witnesses (‘out-of-court confessional statements’) — Consideration of Bannon v The Queen (1995) 185 CLR 1 — Whether out-of-court confessional statements were admissible in exculpation of appellant as exception to hearsay rule......
  • Jones v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 29 April 2009
    ...[101] per McMurdo J. 7R v Freer and Weekes [2004] QCA 97 at [81]–[91] per Jerrard JA (Jones and Holmes JJ agreeing). 8Bannon v The Queen (1995) 185 CLR 1; [1995] HCA 27; see also Nicholls v The Queen (2005) 219 CLR 196 at 266 [183] per Gummow and Callinan JJ; [2005] HCA 1 and Ali v The Quee......
  • Ali v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 8 March 2005
    ...137 ALR 347 at 362; TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124 at 149 [79] per McHugh J. 6 (2002) 212 CLR 124 at 149 [79]. 7Bannon v The Queen (1995) 185 CLR 1. 8 (2002) 212 CLR 124 at 159 9 Ratten v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510 at 517 per Barwick CJ; RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620 at 630 [22......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 9-4, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...1 95B v DPP [2000] 2 AC 428 .................................. 38Balabal v Air India [1988] 1 Ch 317.......... 13 3Bannon v R (1995) 185 CLR 1...................... 123Basto v The Queen (1954) 91 CLR 628 ..... 224Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79 (1986)...... 3 01Beckles v United Kingdom (2003) ......
  • Two English Hearsay Heresies
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 9-2, March 2005
    • 1 March 2005
    ...were among67 Birch [1985] Crim LR 728, 729; Hirst, above n. 5 at 64.68 [1986] AC 41 at 53.69 See the references collected in Bannon v R (1995) 185 CLR 1, 8–10. (In that case, the High Courtof Australia decided not to decide whether to follow the Canadian lead, although it did showsigns of c......
  • Accommodating Legal Pluralism in Pacific Courts: Problems of Proof of Customary Law
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 15-1, January 2011
    • 1 January 2011
    ...RvSmith [1992] 2 SCR 219; RvStarr [2000] 2 SCR 144.81 See, e.g., Walton vThe Queen (1989) 166 CLR 283 at 293–4.82 In Bannon vThe Queen (1995) 185 CLR 1 at 7–8, Brennan CJ expressly rejected the reliability test.83 Laws of Kiribati Act 1980, s. 4(2); Laws of Tuvalu Act 1987, s. and nature’ a......
  • Hearsay by Implication: R v Baldree
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 18-2, April 2014
    • 1 April 2014
    ...(by calling and asking for drugs the callers impliedly asserted their belief that the accused was a drug dealer). 22 Bannon v The Queen (1995) 185 CLR 1 at 22.23 See Federal Rules of Evidence, r. 801.24 P. Roberts and A. Zuckerman, Criminal Evidence (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2004) 5......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT