Banwell v Ship Sydney Sunset

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2001-0309 FCA A
Date2001
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
4 books & journal articles
  • List of cases
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2011-47, January 2011
    • 1 January 2011
    ...Ltd v Todd Shipyard Corporation [1981] AC 221, see also The Halcyon IsleBanwell v The Ship The Sydney Sunset (formerly The Lubs) [2001] FCA 210Barnstable, The 181 US 464 (1901)Beldis, The [1936] P 51Benzen v Jeffries (1697) 91 ER 999Berg, The 1984(4) SA 647 (N)Berliner Bank AG v C Czarnikow......
  • The maritime lien and the present Australian admiralty law
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2011-47, January 2011
    • 1 January 2011
    ...443 at 446; Lewmarine Pty Ltd v The Ship Kaptayanni [1974] VR 465 at 472; Banwell v The Ship “The Sydney Sunset” (formerly The Lubs) [2001] FCA 210 at [14] and [15]. See, however, Liverpool & London SP&I Association v MV Sea Success I [2003] 4 LRI 805, where the Supreme Court of India exten......
  • The Owner's Vulnerability to the Liabilities of the Demise Charterer
    • Australia
    • Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal No. 29-2, October 2015
    • 1 October 2015
    ...of ostensible authority have been established. 53 Ibid 677. 54 [2000] 1 Lloyd's Rep 36. 55 Ibid 55, 1 st col. 56 439 UNTS 195. 57 [2001] FCA 210 (9 March 2001). 58 439 UNTS 195. (2015) 29 ANZ Mar LJ 91 The Owner’s Vulnerability to the Liabilities of the Demise Charterer Only two windows of ......
  • Admiralty and Shipping Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...was no need to construe the words “in respect of” as “arising out of”. Ang JC agreed with the comments of Tamberlin J in The Sydney Sunset[2001] FCA 210 (judgment dated 9.3.2001) in that the words “in respect of” should be given their ordinary and plain meaning without any preconceived rese......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT