Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Barbaro v R (Matter No M3/2013)

Judgment Cited authorities 34 Cited in 426 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFrench CJ,Hayne,Kiefel,Bell JJ.,Gageler J.
Judgment Date12 February 2014
Neutral Citation[2014] HCA 2
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberMatter No M3/2013
Date12 February 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
341 cases
  • R. v. Sharma, 2018 ONSC 1141
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 20 February 2018
    ...Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 52; [2010] HCA 45 at [54]; Barbaro v The Queen; Zirilli v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58; [2014] HCA 2 at It is amply established that sentencing judges may, and should, have regard to historical patterns of sentencing in respect of particular......
  • Crown v JJ
    • Australia
    • Court of Appeal of ACT
    • 27 June 2014
    ...Mr J White (Appellant) Mr S Whybrow (Respondent) Cases Cited: Achurch v The Queen (2014) 306 ALR 566 Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 305 ALR 323 Berowra Holdings Pty Ltd v Gordon (2006) 225 CLR 364 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 302 ALR 192 Bui v DPP (2012) 284 ALR 445 Cameron v Cole (1944) 68 CLR ......
  • Justin Monfries v The Queen
    • Australia
    • Court of Appeal of ACT
    • 16 October 2014
    ...which is sought is consistency in the application of relevant legal principles, not numerical equivalence: Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 305 ALR 323 at 331 [40]. Past sentences provide guidance to sentencing judges and “stand as a yardstick against which to examine a proposed sentence”: Hili ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
11 firm's commentaries
  • Administrative law: NSW and Commonwealth case law developments in administrative law
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 8 February 2017
    ...a decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, which held that the High Court decision in Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58 precluded a Court from receiving submissions as to an agreed civil penalty to be imposed under the Building and Construction Industry Improvement ......
  • 10 tips for statutory prosecutions
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 5 December 2017
    ...to, in addition to any other relevant factors: comparable cases: following the High Court decision in Barbaro v R; Zirilli v R (2014) 253 CLR 58, the Queensland Parliament made amendments to section 15 Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) whereby a submission may be made stating the sente......
  • Civil penalty proceedings: approach of the courts following Barbaro and CFMEU
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 12 July 2015
    ...it would logically follow that it may be more difficult for regulators to negotiate agreed outcomes with respondents. Footnotes 1 (2014) 253 CLR 58. 2 Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FCAFC 59 This publication does n......
  • Getting the Blues - Interstate comparatives now apply to WHS penalty assessments
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 19 May 2017
    ...was not in a position to make submissions about appropriate penalty, due to the effect of the High Court decision in Barbaro v R (2014) 253 CLR 58. By the time of the appeal, section 15 of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) had been amended so as to negate the impact of the Barbaro ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • The 2017 Winterton Lecture. Sir Owen Dixon Today
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 43-1, January 2018
    • 1 January 2018
    ...women still in need of the special protection that Yerkey 95 (1933) 48 CLR 71, 174; [1933] HCA 2. 96 (2014) 252 CLR 307, [11]-[25]; [2014] HCA 2. 97 Project Blue Sky (W’gong) Pty Ltd v ABA (1998) 194 CLR 355, [69]; [1998] HCA 28. 98 Commissioner of Railways (NSW) v Agalianos (1955) 92 CLR 3......
  • First-time offender, productive offender, offender with dependents: why the profile of offenders (sometimes) matters in sentencing.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 78 No. 2, December - December 2014
    • 22 December 2014
    ...Australian jurisdictions). (79) See id. at 1-2. (80) R v Williscroft [1975] VR 292, [paragraph] 31 (Austl.); see also Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2, [paragraph] 41 (Austl.) ("[T]he synthesis of the 'raw material' which must be considered on sentencing, including material like sentencing ......
  • Plea Bargaining: From Patent Unfairness to Transparent Justice.
    • United States
    • Missouri Law Review Vol. 84 No. 1, January 2019
    • 1 January 2019
    ...notes 95-102. (153.) R V Marshall [1981] VR 725 (Austl.); see also UW v Western Australia [No 2], [2007] WASCA 275 (Austl.). (154.) [2014] HCA2, 65 (155.) Id. [paragraph] 7. (156.) Id. [paragraph] 33. (157.) Id [paragraph] 32. (158.) Id. [paragraph] 33. (159.) See generally Mirko Bagaric, S......
  • Constitutional Law and the Limits of Discretion in Family Property Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 44-1, March 2016
    • 1 March 2016
    ...the High Court decided that the sentencing judge should have had regard to the range of 86 Fields and Smith [2015] FamCAFC 57. 87 (2014) 253 CLR 58. 88 Ibid 74. 89 Ibid. 90 (2001) 207 CLR 584. 91 Ibid 608. See also 634 (Kirby J). 92 Ibid 591. 93 [2015] HCA 39. 68 Federal Law Review Volume 4......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT