Bates on behalf of the Malyangapa Part B Claim Group v Attorney General of New South Wales

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
Judgment Date05 October 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 1198
Date05 October 2021


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Bates on behalf of the Malyangapa Part B Claim Group v Attorney General of New South Wales [2021] FCA 1198

File number:

NSD 526 of 2021



Judgment of:

MURPHY J



Date of judgment:

5 October 2021



Catchwords:

NATIVE TITLE – interlocutory application for joinder of respondent parties pursuant to s 84(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (the Act) – interlocutory application for strike-out of a native title determination application under s 84C of the Act on the ground that it is not properly authorised and/or summary dismissal on grounds that it has no reasonable prospect of success and is an abuse of process – whether the native title claim was properly authorised under ss 61 and 251B of the Act – whether the native title application complies with s 62 of the Act – whether the native title claim group are a sub-group – whether the decision-making process for authorising the applicant was pre-determined – whether the native title claim has no reasonable prospect of success under s 31A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and r 26.01(a) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) or constitutes an abuse of process under r 26.01(d) of the Rules – whether to determine such issues in an interlocutory hearing – joinder allowed – strike-out and summary dismissal refused



Legislation:

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 56

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A, 37M

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 61, 61A, 62, 66B, 67, 84(5), 84C, 84D, 190B, 190C, 203BD, 251B, 253

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01(a)



Cases cited:

Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Islanders of the Regional Seas Claim Group v Queensland (No 2) [2010] FCA 643; 204 FCR 1

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v FDRA Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 429

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis [2013] FCA 641; 220 FCR 256

Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] HCA 27; 226 CLR 256

Bodney v Bropho [2004] FCAFC 226; 140 FCR 77

Bodney v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 890

Bolton on behalf of the Southern Noongar Families v State of Western Australia [2004] FCA 760

Booth on behalf of the Kungardutyi Punthamara People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 638

Boston Commercial Services Pty Ltd v GE Capital Finance Australasia Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1352; 236 ALR 720

Brown v State of South Australia [2009] FCA 206

Buurabalayji Thalanyji Aboriginal Corporation v Onslow Salt Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 978

Cox v Journeaux [No 2] [1935] HCA 48; 52 CLR 713

Daniel v Western Australia [2002] FCA 1147; 194 ALR 278

Danthanarayana v Commonwealth of Australia [2016] FCAFC 114

Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners [1949] HCA 1; 78 CLR 62

Forrest on behalf of the Tjalkadjara Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2021] FCA 399

Fourmile on behalf of the Gimuy Walubara Yidinji People v State of Queensland [2018] FCA 572

General Steel Industries v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; 112 CLR 125

Granitgard Pty Ltd v Termicide Pest Control Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 55

Harkin on behalf of the Nanatadjarra People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2021] FCA 3

Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v Station of Western Australia (No 9) [2007] FCA 31; 238 ALR 1

Hazelbane v Northern Territory [2014] FCA 886

Hazelbane v Northern Territory of Australia [2008] FCA 291

Jefferson Ford Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited [2008] FCAFC 60; 167 FCR 372

Kowalski v MMAL Staff Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 117; 259 ALR 319

Lapthorne v Indigenous Land Corporation [2008] FCA 682

Lawson on behalf of the Badimaya Barna Guda People v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 104

Moran v Minister of Land and Water Conservation for the State of New South Wales [1999] FCA 1637

Moti v The Queen [2011] HCA 50; 245 CLR 456

MT (deceased) v Western Australia (No2) [2015] FCA 697

Nyamal Palyku Proceeding [2020] FCA 428

PZ Cussons (International) Ltd v Rose Dora Imports Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1642; 74 IPR 372

Reid v State of South Australia [2007] FCA 1479

Risk v National Native Title Tribunal [2000] FCA 1589

Risk v Northern Territory [2006] FCA 404

Rogers v Assets Loan Co Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1305; 250 ALR 82

Sandy on behalf of the Yugara/Yugarapul People v State of Queensland [2012] FCA 978

Spiteri v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 905

State of Western Australia v Fazeldean on behalf of the Thalanyji People (No 2) [2013] FCAFC 58; 211 FCR 150

State of Western Australia v Strickland [2000] FCA 652; 99 FCR 33

Stuart v State of South Australia (Oodnadatta Common Overlap Proceeding) (No 2) [2021] FCA 194

TJ (on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People) v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 553

Van Hemmen on behalf of the Kabi Kabi People (No 3) [2007] FCA 1185

Velickovic v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 782

Walker v South Australia [2014] FCA 962

Widjabul Wia-Bal v Attorney General of New South Wales [2020] FCAFC 34; 274 FCR 577

Williams v Grant [2004] FCAFC 178

Williams v Spautz [1992] HCA 34; 174 CLR 509



Division:

General Division



Registry:

New South Wales



National Practice Area:

Native Title



Number of paragraphs:

113



Date of hearing:

3 September 2021



Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr C Athanasiou



Solicitor for the Applicant:

South Australian Native Title Services Limited



Counsel for the Respondent:

Mr E Lee



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Crown Solicitor’s Office



Counsel for Clancy John McKellar and Norman John Hodge (interested persons):

Mr A Tokley SC and Ms S Phillips



Solicitor for Clancy John McKellar and Norman John Hodge (interested persons):

Eddy Neumann Lawyers



ORDERS


NSD 526 of 2021

BETWEEN:

JENNIFER BATES & OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE MALYANGAPA PART B CLAIM GROUP

Applicant


AND:

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW SOUTH WALES

Respondent



CLANCY JOHN MCKELLAR

First interested person


NORMAN JOHN HODGE

Second interested person



order made by:

MURPHY J

DATE OF ORDER:

5 OCTOBER 2021



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


1. Clancy John McKellar and Norman John Hodge be joined as respondents to this proceeding.

2. The interlocutory application dated 28 June 2021 brought by Mr McKellar and Mr Hodge to strike-out and/or summarily dismiss the Malyangapa Part B application...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Mann on behalf of the Bigambul People #2 v State of Queensland
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 11 May 2023
    ...Australia and Others (No 4) (2019) 369 ALR 1 Bates on behalf of the Malyangapa Part B Claim Group v Attorney General of New South Wales [2021] FCA 1198 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (2006) 226 CLR 256 Bodney v Bropho (2004) 140 FCR 77; [2004] FCAFC 226 Brown v ......
  • Evans on behalf of the Yarla-Gu Bunna Nangatjara People v State of Western Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 10 November 2021
    ...66B, 84C, 84D, 203BE(2)(a), 251B Cases cited: Bates on behalf of the Malyangapa Part B Claim Group v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2021] FCA 1198 Clarrie Smith v Western Australia [2000] FCA 1249; 104 FCR 49 Dieri People v State of South Australia [2003] FCA 187; 127 FCR 364 Evans v ......
  • Lewis on behalf of the Warrabinga-Wiradjuri People #7 v Attorney General of New South Wales (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 20 October 2021
    ...been responsible for any delay. Recently, in Bates on behalf of the Malyangapa Part B Claim Group v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2021] FCA 1198 at [85] and [88], Murphy J emphasised the need for caution in summarily dismissing an application for native title determination where ther......