Bates on behalf of the Malyangapa Part B Claim Group v Attorney General of New South Wales
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 05 October 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] FCA 1198 |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Date | 05 October 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Mann on behalf of the Bigambul People #2 v State of Queensland
...Australia and Others (No 4) (2019) 369 ALR 1 Bates on behalf of the Malyangapa Part B Claim Group v Attorney General of New South Wales [2021] FCA 1198 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (2006) 226 CLR 256 Bodney v Bropho (2004) 140 FCR 77; [2004] FCAFC 226 Brown v ......
-
Evans on behalf of the Yarla-Gu Bunna Nangatjara People v State of Western Australia
...66B, 84C, 84D, 203BE(2)(a), 251B Cases cited: Bates on behalf of the Malyangapa Part B Claim Group v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2021] FCA 1198 Clarrie Smith v Western Australia [2000] FCA 1249; 104 FCR 49 Dieri People v State of South Australia [2003] FCA 187; 127 FCR 364 Evans v ......
-
Lewis on behalf of the Warrabinga-Wiradjuri People #7 v Attorney General of New South Wales (No 2)
...been responsible for any delay. Recently, in Bates on behalf of the Malyangapa Part B Claim Group v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2021] FCA 1198 at [85] and [88], Murphy J emphasised the need for caution in summarily dismissing an application for native title determination where ther......