Bathurst Regional Council v Local Government Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 5)
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Neutral Citation | 2012-1105 FCA A |
Date | 2012 |
Year | 2012 |
Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 firm's commentaries
-
Class Action Drivers In Australia: D&O Insurance And Access To Deep Pockets
...Australia Ltd (in liq) [2012] FCA 1028 at [1085] and Bathurst Regional Council v Local Government Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 5) [2012] FCA 1200 at The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your spec......
-
Just when you thought it wasn't a derivative
...in mind, the Federal Court of Australia found, in Bathurst Regional Council v Local Government Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 5) [2012] FCA 1200 (Bathurst Regional Council), that a complex financial product known as a constant proportion debt obligation (CPDO) was a derivative, rather than ......
-
ASIC's relief power and how financial service providers can adapt to changes in the law
...the opinion of research houses since decisions such as Bathurst Regional Council v Local Government Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 5) [2012] FCA 1200, where product research providers were found to have provided questionable advice) Appropriate advertising to the market Higher-level benchma......
-
Australian Federal Court Paves The Way For Actions Against Financial Product Ratings Agency
...and rating of financial services products. Footnotes Bathurst Regional Council v Local Government Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 5) [2012] FCA 1200 per Justice Federal Court of Australia Summary of Bathurst Regional Council v Local Government Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 5) [2012] FCA 120......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Credit Advisers, Consumer Credit and Equitable Fiduciary Obligations
...v Dreyer(1958) 101 CLR 428, 452 (Dixon CJ). See, eg, Bathurst Regional Council v Local Government Finan-cial Services Pty Ltd [N o 5] [2012] FCA 1200, [3322] ( Jagot J), where the princip al’s claim forrescission of contract for sale of investment notes with the financial adviser was dismis......