BFH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date31 March 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCAFC 54
Date31 March 2020
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
BFH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 54

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


BFH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 54


Appeal from:

BFH16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCCA 730 and BFI16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCCA 731



File numbers:

VID 403 of 2019

VID 407 of 2019



Judges:

MURPHY, O'BRYAN AND SNADEN JJ



Date of judgment:

31 March 2020



Catchwords:

MIGRATION – refugees – protection visa – refusal to grant protection visa under section 65 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - Administrative Appeals Tribunal – review by Tribunal under Pt 7 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – appeal from Federal Circuit Court of Australia – applicants’ claim for protection grounded on claim to be member of particular social group, being homosexuals in Pakistan – appeals allowed – matters remitted to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal


ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – administrative law – judicial review – jurisdictional error – whether decision by Tribunal unreasonable, irrational or illogical – whether certain factual findings made by the Tribunal lacked an evident and intelligible justification or the reasoning was not open on the evidence or lacked a logical connection between the evidence and the conclusions drawn – applicable principles – whether evidence of particular facts rationally probative of a fact in issue – materiality of reasoning in error – writ of certiorari issued – writ of mandamus issued



Legislation:

Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)

Migration Act 1958 (Cth)



Cases cited:

ARG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 250 FCR 109

Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321

BFH16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCCA 730

BFI16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCCA 731

BZD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 263 FCR 292

DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 258 FCR 175

DYS16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 260 FCR 260

EHF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1681

Goldsmith v Sandilands (2002) 190 ALR 370

Guo v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 64 FCR 151

Harrington-Smith v Western Australia (No 7) (2003) 130 FCR 424

Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123

Kopalapillai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 547

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh (2014) 231 FCR 437

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton (2016) 237 FCR 1

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611

Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476

Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437

Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 73 ALD 1

Selvadurai v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 34 ALD 347



Date of hearing:

27 February 2020



Date of last submissions:

20 February 2020


Registry:



Division:



National Practice Area:



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

71



Counsel for the Appellants:

Ms E Latif



Solicitor for the Appellants

Carina Ford Immigration Lawyers



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Mr N Wood



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor



Counsel for the Second Respondent:

The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice save as to costs


ORDERS


VID 403 of 2019

BETWEEN:

BFH16

Appellant


AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION

First Respondent


ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent



JUDGEs:

MURPHY, O’BRYAN AND SNADEN JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

31 march 2020



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The appeal be allowed.

  2. Paragraph 2 of the orders of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia made on 29 March 2019 be set aside and, in lieu thereof, the following orders be made:

    1. A writ of certiorari issue directed to the second respondent quashing the decision of the second respondent dated 29 April 2016 (case number 1417176).

    2. A writ of mandamus issue directed to the second respondent requiring it to determine, according to law, the application made to it by the appellant for review of the decision of a delegate of the first respondent made on 1 October 2014 under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).

  1. Paragraph 2 of the orders of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia made on 1 April 2019 be set aside and, in lieu thereof, the following order be made:

The first respondent pay the appellant’s costs of the Federal Circuit Court proceeding.

  1. The first respondent pay the appellant’s costs of the appeal.

  2. The name of the first respondent be changed to ‘Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs’.


Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

ORDERS


VID 407 of 2019


BETWEEN:

BFI16

Appellant


AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION

First Respondent


ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent



JUDGEs:

murphy, o’bryan and snaden jj

DATE OF ORDER:

31 march 2020



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The appeal be allowed.

  2. Paragraph 2 of the orders of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia made on 29 March 2019 be set aside and, in lieu thereof, the following orders be made:

    1. A writ of certiorari issue directed to the second respondent quashing the decision of the second respondent dated 29 April 2016 (case number 1417175).

    2. A writ of mandamus issue directed to the second respondent requiring it to determine, according to law, the application made to it by the appellant for review of the decision of a delegate of the first respondent made on 1 October 2014 under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).

  1. Paragraph 2 of the orders of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia made on 1 April 2019 be set aside and, in lieu thereof, the following order be made:

The first respondent pay the appellant’s costs of the Federal Circuit Court proceeding.

  1. The first respondent pay the appellant’s costs of the appeal.

  2. The name of the first respondent be changed to ‘Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs’.


Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

MURPHY AND O’BRYAN JJ:

Introduction
  1. The appellants, designated BFH16 and BFI16 to keep their identity confidential, appeal from orders made by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia on 29 March 2019, dismissing applications for judicial review of decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) made on 29 April 2016. The Tribunal had affirmed decisions of a...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 cases
  • BHL19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 28 May 2020
    ...Protection [2019] FCAFC 27 BAL19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 2189 BFH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 54 BFW20 by his Litigation Representative BFW20A v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 56......
  • Gardiner v Taungurung Land and Waters Council
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 9 February 2021
    ...v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 133; 266 FCR 83 BFH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 54 Bright v Northern Land Council [2018] FCA 752 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; 252 FCR 352 Corun......
  • Stewart v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 12 November 2020
    ...Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1176 BFH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 54 BHL19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 94 Commissioner of Taxes (Vic) v Lennon [1921......
  • Hillis v Minister for Home Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 3 August 2021
    ...Protection v Splendido (2019) 271 FCR 595; [2019] FCAFC 132 BFH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2020) 274 FCR 532; [2020] FCAFC 54 BHL19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2020) 277 FCR 420; [2020] FCAFC 94 Brett Cattle C......
  • Get Started for Free