Blomley v Ryan

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1956
Neutral Citation[1956] HCA 81,1956-0328 HCA A
Date1956
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
225 cases
4 firm's commentaries
  • Competition & Consumer Law News – 5 July 2017
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 6 July 2017
    ...there was no 'victimisation or exploitation' - Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) 12CA(1) - Blomley v Ryan [1956] HCA 81; (1956) 99 CLR 362; Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447; Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2013] HCA 25;......
  • Property & Projects – What's News - 23 September 2014
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 26 September 2014
    ...- Yerkey v Jones [1939] HCA 3; (1939) 63 CLR 649 - Garcia v National Australia Bank [1998] HCA 48; (1998) 194 CLR 395 - Blomley v Ryan [1956] HCA 81; (1956) 99 CLR 362 - Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447 - Bridgewater v Leahy [1998] HCA 66; (1998) 1......
  • Contract Law 101 ' The Essential Elements
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 14 October 2023
    ...all may be relevant, depending on the agreement. The main case in Australia in relation to "capacity" in contract law is Blomley v Ryan (1954) 99 CLR 362. In this case, the High Court of Australia held that a person has capacity to contract if they understand the nature of the contract and ......
  • State Of Play: The Unconscionable Conduct Yo-Yo Goes Back To The High Court
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 March 2022
    ...Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447. 6. A summary of this law is provided in Stubbings at [155]. 7. Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362. 8. Stubbings 9. Stubbings [34]. 10. Stubbings [76]-[84]. 11. Stubbings [90]-[91], [94]. 12. Stubbings [152]. 13. Stubbings [44], [47]. 14. Stub......
11 books & journal articles
  • CONSUMER PROTECTION, STATUTE AND
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...Bargains in Equity and under Statute”(2015) 9 J Eq 188 (discussing this relationship in the Australian context). 89Blomley v Ryan(1956) 99 CLR 362 at 392, per McTiernan J; Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio[1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447 at 462, per Mason J, and 476–477, per Deane ......
  • Where the Action Is: Macro and Micro Justice in Contract Law
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 83-4, July 2020
    • 1 July 2020
    ...49, (2017) FLC 93-807 (Thorne), see also ASIC vKobelt [2019] HCA 18.105 Thorne ibid at [38], citing Amadio ibid, 462.106 Blomley vRyan [1956] HCA 81, (1956) 99 CLR 362, 415.107 Bridgewater vLeahy [1998] HCA 66, (1998) 194 CLR 457, 490.108 Johnson vShrewsbury and Birmingham Ry (1853) 3 DM & ......
  • Contract formation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...(2003) 214 CLr 51 at [10], per Gleeson CJ; Sandar Aung v Parkway Hospitals Singapore Pte Ltd [2007] SGCa 20 at [39]. 504 Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLr 362 at 415, per Kitto J. 505 Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLr 362 at 405–406, per Fullagar J. 506 Mirvac (Docklands) Pty Ltd v La Rocca [2006] VS......
  • VITIATING FACTORS IN CONTRACT LAW — THE INTERACTION OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1998, December 1998
    • 1 December 1998
    ...8 Ch App 484, respectively. 307 And see generally the discussion, supra. 308 [1996] 2 SLR 706 at 709 (emphasis added). 309 (1954—56) 99 CLR 362. 310 Judith Prakash J, in Rajabali Jumabhoy v Ameerali R Jumabhoy, infra, note 332, appeared to accept that Blomley v Ryan was such an authority. I......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT