Bodum v Dksh Australia Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 2011-0805 FCA D,[2011] FCAFC 98 |
| Year | 2011 |
| Date | 2011 |
| Court | Federal Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
19 cases
-
Allergan Australia Pty Ltd v Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd
...191 PepsiCo Australia Pty Ltd v Kettle Chip Co Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 48; 135 ALR 192 Peter Bodum A/S and Others v DKSH Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 98; 280 ALR 639 Pfizer v Karam [2006] FCA 1663; 219 FCR 585 Pham Global Pty Ltd v Insight Clinical Imaging Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 83; 251 FCR 379 ......
-
Williams v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited (Initial Trial)
...Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift [2021] FCA 1384 Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63 Bodum v DKSH Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 98; (2011) 280 ALR 639 Boral Besser Masonry Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 5; (2004) 215 CLR 374 Bramhill v Edwa......
-
PDP Capital Pty Ltd v Grasshopper Ventures Pty Ltd
...“ordinary” members of that class of the public would, or are likely to, be misled or deceived: Peter Bodum A/S v DKSH Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 98; (2011) 280 ALR 639 at [204]-[210] (Peter Bodum). In either case, the analysis in the present case remains the same, as does the conclusion......
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Woolworths Limited
...per Siopis J; ConAgra Inc v McCain Foods (Aust) Pty Ltd [1992] FCA 159; (1992) 33 FCR 302 at 380-381; Bodum v DKSH Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 98; (2011) 280 ALR 639 at [31] The question of what is the natural and ordinary meaning conveyed by a publication or conduct is to be ascertained......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Plunger wars: Latest decision bodes well for Bodum
...with the rival trader's brand. The recent decision of the Full Federal Court in Peter Bodum A/S & Ors v DKSH Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 98 casts some doubt on whether that is a correct reading of the High Court's What was the case about? The well-known Bodum Chambord coffee plunger ......
-
Rights and Reputation in Product Look and Feel - Full Federal Court Finds that the sale of similar looking coffee plungers is misleading and deceptive and constitutes passing off
...and similar products can take great comfort from this month's Full Federal Court decision in Bodum v DKSH Australia Pty Limited [2011] FCAFC 98. In a case concerning the Danish design company, Bodum's flagship Chambord coffee plunger, the majority of the court1 confirmed that the look and f......