Bp Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Hastings Shire Council

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1977
Neutral Citation1977-0727 HCA A,[1977] HCA 40
Date1977
Year1977
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
800 cases
16 firm's commentaries
  • Inside track: Property & Real Estate - in the media and cases
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 13 November 2019
    ...entitling the Purchaser to relief against forfeiture of his interest in the land - BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Hastings SC (1977) 180 CLR 266; Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Pty Ltd [1979] HCA 51; (1979) 144 CLR 596; Simcevski v Dixon [2017] VSC ......
  • Construction & Infrastructure - What's News - 19 August 2014
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 24 August 2014
    ...surveyor under an obligation to inform owner that planning permit has expired – BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – Building Act 1993 (Vic) – Interpretation of legislation - Building actions – Limitation of actions – Whether 'lon......
  • Construction & Infrastructure - What's News - 3 February 2015
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 5 February 2015
    ...repudiation - termination - damages. Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) 90 CLR 613 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337 R......
  • The standard of proof in workplace investigations
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 20 March 2015
    ...that for a term to be implied, it must satisfy the tests set out in BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Limited v Hastings Shire Council (1977) 180 CLR 266 at 282 to 283; Codelfa Construction Pty Limited v State Rail Authority of NSW [1982] HCA 24; 149 CLR 337 at 347 as It must reasonable and equ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • RE-EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MUTUAL PROMISES IN CONTRACT LAW.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 2, April 2022
    • 1 April 2022
    ...Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NS W (1982) 149 CLR 337 (' Codelfa); BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 ('BP (82) The test for implication of a term in fact in Australia requires satisfaction of five cumulative conditions, of which one is business eff......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Preliminary Sections
    • 30 August 2016
    ...16, 52 Bowden’s Application, Re (1983) 47 P & CR 455, [1983] JPL 819, LT 332 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 276 Brace v South East Regional Housing Association Ltd [1984] 1 EGLR 144 38 Bracewell v Appleby [1975] Ch 408, [1975] 2 WLR 282, [1975] ......
  • Meaning and Construction of Certain Restrictive Covenants which Impact on the Development and Commercial Use of Land
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part IV. Restrictive covenants (freehold land)
    • 30 August 2016
    ...& Colls Ltd v North West Metropolitan Regional Hospital Board [1973] 1 WLR 601; BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266; The Moorcock (1889) 14 PD 64. 7 Marks & Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72. SPECIFIC......
  • GOOD FAITH IN THE PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS REVISITED
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...155 observed that the New South Wales Court of Appeal decisions (up to 2001) preferred good faith to be implied as a term by law. 68 (1977) 180 CLR 266 at 282–283. 69 [2013] 4 SLR 193. 70 See para 48 below. 71 See paras 39–50 below. 72 See, eg, Renard Constructions (ME) Pty v Minister for P......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT