Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Neutral Citation | 1995-0223 HCA A,[1995] HCA 10 |
Date | 1995 |
Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
118 cases
- Australian Communications Authority v Viper Communications Pty Ltd
- North Ganalanja Aboriginal Corporation and Bidanggu Aboriginal Corporation for and on behalf of the Waanyi People v Queensland and Cra Exploration Pty Ltd
- Commonwealth of Australia v Anti-Discrimination Tribunal (Tasmania)
- Stack v Commissioner of Patents
Request a trial to view additional results
31 books & journal articles
-
Arbitrate this! Enforcing foreign arbitral awards and chapter III of the Constitution.
...(1) New York Convention, opened for signature 10 June 1958, 330 UNTS 38 (entered into force 7 June 1959). (2) IAA s 8. (3) (1995) 183 CLR 245. (4) (1999) 197 CLR (5) (2001) 203 CLR 645. (6) Peter B Rutledge, 'Arbitration and Article III' (2008) 61 Vanderbilt Law Review 1189, 1191. But see M......
-
Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
...Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330, 357 (Griffith CJ). 58 Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 183 CLR 245, 267 (Deane, Dawson, Gaudron and McHugh JJ): 'Difficulty arises in attempting to formulate a comprehensive definition of judicial power ......
-
The Nature of Merits Review: A Bold Vision Realised in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
...45; Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW) (2010) 239 CLR 531, 566 [55], 581 [100]. 193 Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 183 CLR 245, 261. 194 Eastman v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 1, 40–1 [130]. 195 Tan v National Australia Bank Ltd [2008] NSWCA 198, [11]. See discussion b......
-
Federal Constitutional Influences on State Judicial Review
...(WA), s 86. Such provisions are plainly unconstitutional at the federal level: Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 183 CLR 245. Kirk seems to permit the continuation of such differences. 53 Gageler, above n 15, 140, 156. 54 (2003) 211 CLR 476, 514 [104] (Gaudron, M......
Request a trial to view additional results