Bray v F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 2002 |
| Neutral Citation | 2002-0313 FCA B |
| Date | 2002 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Court | Federal Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
57 cases
1 firm's commentaries
-
Cartel Conduct To Be A Criminal Offence In Australia
...MacLeod v R (2003) 197 ALR 333 2 [2007] EW HC 71 3 Paras [67-68] 4 (2003) 197 ALR 333 at paras 37 and 46 5 Bray v F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd (2002) 190 ALR 1; and see comments by the High Court in ZHU v Treasurer of New South Wales (2004) 218 CLR 530 at para [97] 6 Commerce Commission v Koppers......
3 books & journal articles
-
Broadening the Extraterritorial Reach of Australia's Cartel Prohibition: Adopting the ‘Effects’ Doctrine without the Negative Effects
...of the competition prohibitions (see Trade Practices Commission v Australia Meat Holdings (1988) 83 ALR 299, 355). In Bray (trial) (2002) 118 FCR 1, 17 Merkel J suggested that legislative oversight may explain why s 5 did not extend to such conduct. 61 The requirements of s 5(1) must be sat......
-
The role of damages in regulating horizontal price-fixing: comparing the situation in the United States, Europe and Australia.
...21 ATPR [paragraph]41-691 ; Energex Ltd v Alstom Australia Ltd (2004) 24 ATPR(Digest) [paragraph]46-251; Bray v F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd (2002) 118 FCR 1. The most recent claim is against Amcor Ltd: see Amcor Ltd, above n 22, (204) See Davis, above n 22. (205) Section 45(2)(a)(ii) prohibits m......
-
The empire will strike back: the overlooked dimension to the parallel import debate.
...Trade Practices Commission v Australia Meat Holdings Pty Ltd (1988) 83 ALR 299, 356 (Wilcox J). (117) Bray v F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd (2002) 118 FCR 1,45-6 [147] (Merkel (118) Costa Vraca Pty Ltd v Bell Regal Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 65 (12 February 2003). This was a claim for breach of the consume......