Braysich v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | French CJ,Crennan,Kiefel JJ.,Heydon J.,Bell J. |
| Judgment Date | 11 May 2011 |
| Neutral Citation | 2011-0511 HCA A,[2011] HCA 14 |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | P32/2010 |
| Date | 11 May 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
R v Khazaal
...the commission of terrorist acts. 72 The respondent characterised s 105.5(5) as providing an affirmative defence, and relied on Braysich v The Queen71 to support the proposition that caution should be adopted before preventing a person in the position of the respondent from relying on an af......
-
Momcilovic v The Queen
...JJ; [1965] HCA 34; Braysich v The Queen (2011) 85 ALJR 593 at 604–605 [33] per French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ; 276 ALR 451 at 464; [2011] HCA 14. 23 See eg Kiefel, ‘Comparative Analysis in Judicial Decision-Making: The Australian Experience’, (2011) 75(2) The Rabel Journal of Comparative ......
-
James v R
...J, 441 [101] per Callinan J. 15 Pemble v The Queen (1971) 124 CLR 107 at 117–118 per Barwick CJ; [1971] HCA 20; Braysich v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 434 at 452–453 [32] per French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ; [2011] HCA 16 Section 276(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic) relevantly prov......
-
The King v Anna Rowan – a pseudonym
...(“ Lynch”) at 668 per Lord Morris; Zaharias (2001) 122 A Crim R 586 at 599 [79] per O'Bryan A-JA, Winneke P and Vincent JA agreeing. 20 (2011) 243 CLR 434 at 454 [36(1)] per French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel 21 Taiapa v The Queen (2009) 240 CLR 95 at 109 [39] per French CJ, Heydon, Crennan, Kie......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Defence of Duress Under the Criminal Code (WA)
...47 R v Howe [1987] AC 417, 430. 48 Fingleton v The Queen [2005] HCA 34; (2005) 227 CLR 166, [77]-[78] (McHugh J). 49 Braysich v The Queen [2011] HCA 14; (2011) 243 CLR 434, [17], [36] (French CJ, Crennan & Kiefel JJ). 189 A trial judge must leave the defence of duress to the jury if, at the......