O'brien v Dawson
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1942-0507 HCA A,[1942] HCA 8 |
| Date | 1942 |
| Year | 1942 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
49 cases
- Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Acn 000 247 601 Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) (Formerly Stanley Thompson Valuers Pty Ltd)
-
Chong Hon Kuan Ivan v Levy Maurice and Others (No 2)
...v Lane, Thatcher and Bernston (1982) 28 Sask R 311 (“Schmeichel”). I will come back to this case later. 19 In O’Brien v Dawson (1942) 66 CLR 18, the plaintiff commenced an action against a company and two of its directors Doyle and Dawson for conspiracy to injure him as a result of the comp......
-
Nerijus Antuzis and Others v DJ Houghton Catching Services Ltd
...the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions such as Australia and Canada (see the High Court of Australia's decision in O'Brien v Dawson (1942) 66 CLR 18 (“ O'Brien v Dawson”) at 34 and the Newfoundland Court of Appeal's decision in Imperial Oil Ltd v C&G Holdings Ltd (1989) 62 DLR (4th) 261......
-
Lictor Anstalt (a company registered in Liechtenstein) v Mir Steel UK Ltd (Proposed Part 20 Claimant/First Defendant)
...whether the claim is made for inducing a breach of contract or for an unlawful means conspiracy. The High Court of Australia so held in O'Brien v. Dawson (1942) 66 CLR 18 and, in my judgment, the position is the same in English law. 69 As regards the claim against Alphasteel, Mr Tamlyn reli......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Tort Law
...[2018] 5 SLR 1. 3 [2018] SGHC 166. See para 26.39 below. 4 [1920] 3 KB 497. 5 [1996] 3 SLR(R) 637 at [47]–[50]. 6 See para 26.1 above. 7 (1942) 66 CLR 18. 8 (1989) 62 DLR (4th) 261. 9 [2004] 4 SLR(R) 801. 10 [2008] 1 SLR(R) 80. 11 [2011] 1 SLR 1155. 12 [2015] 2 SLR 271. 13 [2018] 1 SLR 818.......
-
THE COMPANY AND ITS DIRECTORS AS CO-CONSPIRATORS
...Stocznia Gdanska SA v Latvian Shipping Co[2001] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 537. 12 G Scammell & Naphew, Ld v Hurley [1928] 1 KB 419; O’Brien v Dawson(1942) 66 CLR 18. Note, however, that Starke J had in O’Brien v Dawson described the allegation of a conspiracy to breach a contract as “a little whimsical......