Bright v Femcare Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 2001-1019 FCA D,2002-0122 FCA A,2000-0419 FCA B,2000-0605 FCA A |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
-
Thorpe v. Honda Canada Inc., 2011 SKQB 72
...and the United States, both federal states, have addressed similar issues in like manner: see generally Femcare Ltd. v. Bright , [2000] FCA 512 (April 19, 2000) (Australia); Shutts [105 S.Ct. 2965 (1985)]. "[94] Mass torts and defective products do not respect provincial boundaries. Complex......
- Reinsurance Australia Corporation Ltd (ACN 47 008 482 291) v HIH Casualty and General Insurance (in Liquidation) (ACN 47 008 482 291)
-
Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall
...FCR 168 Davis v Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia [2010] FCAFC 141 Falcke v Gray (1850) 4 Drew 651; 62 ER 250 Femcare Ltd v Bright [2000] FCA 512; 100 FCR 331 Fisher v Fisher [1986] HCA 61; 161 CLR 438 Fostif Pty Ltd v Campbells Cash & Carry Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 83; 63 NSWLR 203 Geor......
- Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Cir. 1997) ................................................................................................ 187 Femcare Ltd v. Bright, [2000] FCA 512 (H.C.A.) ..........................................461– 62 Ferrigno v. Eli Lilly & Co., 175 N.J. Super. 551, 420 A.2d 1305 (Sup. Ct. 1980) ........
-
National Class Actions in Canada: Yet Another Call for Clarity and Coordination
...LeBel J explains that the obligation to supply potential class members with sufficient notice is highly context44 Femcare Ltd v Bright, [2000] FCA 512 at para 74 (HCA). 45 Cassels & Jones, above note 24 at 465. 46 [2009] 1 SCR 549 [Lépine]. Volume 8, N o 1, december 2012 53 ual. As a matter......
-
Le Recours Collectif et La Loi Sur La Protection Du Consommateur : Complicité, Utilité, Complémentarité
...LeBel J explains that the obligation to supply potential class members with sufficient notice is highly context44 Femcare Ltd v Bright, [2000] FCA 512 at para 74 (HCA). 45 Cassels & Jones, above note 24 at 465. 46 [2009] 1 SCR 549 [Lépine]. Volume 8, N o 1, december 2012 53 ual. As a matter......
-
Necessary Analysis - Unexpected Outcomes
...LeBel J explains that the obligation to supply potential class members with sufficient notice is highly context44 Femcare Ltd v Bright, [2000] FCA 512 at para 74 (HCA). 45 Cassels & Jones, above note 24 at 465. 46 [2009] 1 SCR 549 [Lépine]. Volume 8, N o 1, december 2012 53 ual. As a matter......
Request a trial to view additional results