Brodie v Singleton Shire Council
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Judge | Gleeson CJ,Gaudron,McHugh,Gummow JJ,Kirby J,Hayne J,Callinan J |
| Date | 31 May 2001 |
| Docket Number | S44/1999 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
214 cases
-
Mcnamara (Mcgrath) v Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal
...here. I adhere to the opinions that I expressed in it. 83 One particular consideration that I thought relevant and important in Brodie v Singleton Shire Council104 is present here: that the common law principle or doctrine which a party wished to have overruled, or held to have been propoun......
-
Steenkamp NO v Provincial Tender Board, Eastern Cape
...HCA 59) at 19 [27] per Gaudron J, 59 [160] per Gummow J, 72 [203] per Kirby J; Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512 ([2001] HCA 29) at 540 [56] per Gaudron J, McHugh J and Gummow J. In some cases the High Court has found that the statutory provisions at issue indicate that th......
-
Tame v New South Wales
...Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180 at 200 [34], 224–225 [115]–[117], 244–245 [176]–[178], 306–307 [347]–[348]. 125 (1999) 198 CLR 180. 126 (2001) 75 ALJR 992 at 1003 [59]; 180 ALR 145 at 127 In Hughes v Hunters Hill Municipal Council (1992) 29 NSWLR 232 at 236. 128 The Province and Function of Law,......
-
Neindorf v Junkovic
...the respondent a duty of care of some kind 41. He also accepted that Ghantous was a special case, delivered concurrently with Brodie v Singleton Shire Council42, and addressed fundamentally the previously anomalous immunity of highway authorities for nonfeasance in respect of the upkeep of ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker: High Court closes the door on the invisible trust and confidence term, but will another door then open to something more effective and visible?
...legislative environment (see for example SGIO v Trigwell (1979) 142 CLR 617 at 633, and Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (20010 206 CLR 512 at 532; see also State of New South Wales v Paige (2002) NSWLR 371 at 400). It is nothing remarkably Fourthly, what is this alleged creature called "th......
8 books & journal articles
-
Of Kings and Officers — The Judicial Development of Public Law
...establishing a distinction between misfeasance and malfeasance in respect of highway authorities: see Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512, 564–565, 590–91, 607–13. 74 See Everett v Griffiths [1921] 1 AC 631; In re McC [1985] 1 AC 528; Rajski v Powell (1987) 11 NSWLR 522; Abi......
-
Judicial Review of Non-Statutory Executive Powers
...law _____________________________________________________________________________________ 41 See, eg, Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512, 555 [92] (McHugh and Gummow JJ), noting that in Australia the term 'non-justiciability' has been used 'to describe controversies within ......
-
The Development of the High Court's Willingness to Overrule Common Law Precedent
...recent common law overruling decisions of the High Court (Imbree v McNeilly (2008) 236 CLR 510, Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512 and Esso Australia Resources v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49), with the aim of identifying normative principles of overrul......
-
The Australian High Court and Social Facts: A Content Analysis Study
...v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1. 94 Tame v New South Wales (2002) 211 CLR 317. 95 Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512. 96 New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511. 97 Cole v South Tweed Heads Rugby League Football Club (2004) 217 CLR 469. 98 Czatyrko v Edith Cowan U......
Request a trial to view additional results