Brott v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1992] HCA 5,1992-0225 HCA A
Date1992
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Minister for the Environment v Sharma
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 15 March 2022
    ...and Traffic Authority v Royal [2008] HCA 19; 245 ALR 653 Roe v Minister of Health [1954] 2 QB 66 Romeo v Conservation Commission (NT) [1992] HCA 5; 192 CLR 431 Rosenberg v Percival [2001] HCA 18; 205 CLR 434 Rowling v Takaro Properties Ltd [1988] AC 473 San Sebastian Pty Ltd v Minister Admi......
  • Isabel Redrup Agency Pte Ltd v A L Dakshnamoorthy and others and another suit
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 March 2016
    ...of 1895 (“Jawala Ram”) on the offence of forgery under the Indian Penal Code, as well as the Australian decision of Brott v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 426 (“Brott”) on the common law offence of forgery. The core of her submissions is that the offence of forgery under the Penal Code is not mad......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT