Brown v Rezitis

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1970] HCA 56,1970-1218 HCA A
Date1970
Year1970
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
31 cases
  • Old Ugc Inc. v Industrial Relations Commission of Nsw in Court Session
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 18 May 2006
    ...Australian Journal of Labour Law 50 at 66. 41Davies v General Transport Development Pty Ltd [1967] AR (NSW) 371 at 374 per Sheldon J. 42Brown v Rezitis (1970) 127 CLR 157 at 43Davies [1967] AR (NSW) 371 at 374; cf Palgo Holdings Pty Ltd v Gowans (2005) 221 CLR 249 at 280–284 [95]–[111]. 44B......
  • Fish v Solution 6 Holdings Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 18 May 2006
    ...earlier decisions 25 This Court first considered questions about the operation of s 88F of the 1940 Act (as amended by the 1966 Act) in Brown v Rezitis19. That case concerned the ambit of the Commission's power under s 88F to order payment of money, and it was held that the power was not li......
  • Public Service Association of South Australia v Federated Clerks' Union of Australia (Sa Branch)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Batterham v Qsr Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 18 May 2006
    ...Such a facility was essential to respond to the dangers inherent in ‘clever’ legal drafting. The ambit of the power was explained in Brown v Rezitis97. It is conditioned only on the requirement that the order must be made ‘in connection with’ a contract or arrangement. There is no other jur......
  • Get Started for Free