Bulejcik v R
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Neutral Citation | [1996] HCA 50,1996-0417 HCA B |
Year | 1996 |
Date | 1996 |
Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
-
Evans v The Queen
... ... Prosecution counsel's requests were also relevant in being capable of eliciting answers favourable to the prosecution ... 182 The accused submitted, apparently relying on Bulejcik v The Queen 137 , that evidence of the speech idiosyncrasy shared by the accused and the offender was irrelevant unless the jury could compare the accused's voice in court with an out of court recording. That case affords no warrant for the submission, which is contrary to principle ... ...
-
Gately v The Queen
...42 Reasons of Hayne J at [82]. 43 R v H [1999] 2 Qd R 283 at 290 [18], 295 [47]–[49]; R v C [2000] 2 Qd R 54. 44 Bulejcik v The Queen (1996) 185 CLR 375 at 45 Especially Rawlings [1995] 1 WLR 178; [1995] 1 All ER 580; Welstead [1996] 1 Cr App R 59 and R v Thomas (1992) 9 CRNZ 113. 46 (2002......
-
Festa v R
...R 58 at 72. 55R v O'Sullivan unreported, Supreme Court of Queensland, Court of Appeal, 21 July 1995 at 4. 56 cf Bulejcik v The Queen (1996) 185 CLR 375 at 381–382 per Brennan CJ, 394–395 per Toohey and Gaudron JJ, 406–407 per McHugh and Gummow JJ. 57 (1968) 117 CLR 313 at 316. 58 [1946] KB ......
-
AK v The State of Western Australia
...Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA), s 352(1)(ab). 36R v Taufahema (2007) 228 CLR 232 at 256 [52]; [2007] HCA 11. 37Bulejcik v The Queen (1996) 185 CLR 375; [1996] 185 CLR. 38 Union v State 66 SE 24 (Ga App, 1909) (‘the liquid … smelled like whisky’); Sherrard v Jacob [1965] NILR 151 at 160 (‘f......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
FACIAL RECOGNITION AND IMAGE COMPARISON EVIDENCE: IDENTIFICATION BY INVESTIGATORS, FAMILIARS, EXPERTS, SUPER-RECOGNISERS AND ALGORITHMS.
...54) [26]-[27], [41], [60]-[61] (Heydon JA); R v El-Kheir [2004] NSWCCA 461, [94]-[97], [111]- [114] (Tobias JA); Bulejcik v The Queen (1996) 185 CLR 375, 382-3 (Brennan (126) Where those proffering opinions are translators (who understand the language on the recording), they might have an a......
-
The Quasi-Expert Witness: Fish or Fowl?
...witness's purported identification of the offender fromtwo words spoken three years previously. In the Australian case of Bulejcik v R(1996) 185 CLR 375, the jury were asked to compare the defendant’s voice in146 The Journal of Criminal Law (2009) 73 JCL of identification evidence.7The di......
-
A fair ‘hearing’
...in his list.6. Jury voice comparisons have been deemed an acceptable form of voice identification evidence; Bulejcik vThe Queen, (1996)185 CLR 375. See also RvSolomon [2005] SASC 265 at [57] (‘I proceed on the basis that Bulejcik is authority for theproposition that the jury can compare rec......