Bull v R; King v R; Marotta v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | McHugh,Gummow,Hayne Jj |
| Judgment Date | 11 May 2000 |
| Neutral Citation | [2000] HCA 24,2000-0511 HCA B |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | Matter No P62/1998 |
| Date | 11 May 2000 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
Stephen Stubbs v R
...v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 606 per Callinan J, with whom Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, Gummow and Hayne JJ agreed at [47]; and Bull v The Queen [2000] HCA 24; (2000) 79 ALAJR 837. 20 Crofts v The Queen was an appeal from a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal in Victoria which dealt with a quest......
-
Gedeon v Commissioner of NSW Crime Commission
...CLR 275 at 305–306 per McHugh J; [1997] HCA 47; Gipp (1998) 194 CLR 106 at 156 [141] per Kirby J. 465 (1997) 191 CLR 275 at 310. 466 (2000) 201 CLR 443 at 463 [68]; [2000] HCA 467Bull v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 443 at 463 [69], referring to B v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 599 at 619. 468Gipp (......
-
Collins v The Queen
...Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594 at 603 [39] per Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne and Callinan JJ; [1998] HCA 60; Bull v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 443 at 466 [79] per McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ; [2000] HCA 24. 13 Morris v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 454 at 469 per Deane, Toohey and Gaudron J......
-
Smith v Western Australia
...(1937) 57 CLR 630 at 636, 638; [1937] HCA 44. 43 Lloyd v Powell Duffryn Steam Coal Co Ltd [1914] AC 733 at 751–752; Bull v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 443 at 478–479 [121]; [2000] HCA 44 Hughes v National Trustees, Executors and Agency Co of Australasia Ltd (1979) 143 CLR 134 ; [1979] HCA 2......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Whither, hither and thither, Res Gestae? A comparative analysis
of its relevance and application
...that the admis-sibility of evidence is only one aspect of the case—the crux of the courts’attention is still the pleaded66. Bull vR[2000] HCA 24 at [11]; HML vThe Queen [2008] HCA 16 at [495]–[496]; Dasreef Pty Ltd vHawchar [2011] HCA 21at [78]; Roach vThe Queen [2011] HCA 12 at [30]; Baker......
-
Due Process, Judicial Power and Chapter III in the New High Court
...circumstances is _____________________________________________________________________________________ 148 See, eg, Bull v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 443, 483; Crampton v The Queen (2000) 206 CLR 161, 208; KRM v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 221, 254; Cameron (2002) 209 CLR 339, 370; Ng v The Quee......
-
Victim legal representation and the adversarial criminal trial: A critical analysis of proposals for third-party counsel for complainants of serious sexual violence
...NSWCCA 6; RvEdwards [2015] NSWCCA 24; GEH vR[2012]NSWCCA 150; JWM vR[2014] NSWCCA 248; Adams vR[2018] NSWCCA 303.42. See Bull vR(2000) 201 CLR 443; RvOL [2004] QCA 439; RvWannan (2006) 94 SASR 521; Bolton vWestern Australia[2007] WASCA 277.Kirchengast be inferred from acts alone. This may g......
-
Due Process, Judicial Power and Chapter III in the New High Court
...circumstances is _____________________________________________________________________________________ 148 See, eg, Bull v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 443, 483; Crampton v The Queen (2000) 206 CLR 161, 208; KRM v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 221, 254; Cameron (2002) 209 CLR 339, 370; Ng v The Quee......