Burge v Swarbrick

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gummow,Kirby,Heydon,Crennan JJ
Judgment Date26 April 2007
Neutral Citation[2007] HCA 17,2007-0426 HCA A
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberP24/2006
Date26 April 2007
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 cases
  • Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • July 27, 2011
    ...is a composite phrase which must be construed as a whole, and that view has had recent support from the High Court of Australia ( Swarbrick v Burge (2007) 232 CLR 21 Section 22 of the 1911 Act provided as follows: "(1) This Act shall not apply to designs capable of being registered under th......
  • JT International SA v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • October 5, 2012
    ...Australian Tape Manufacturers Association Ltd v The Commonwealth (1993) 176 CLR 480 at 527 per Dawson and Toohey JJ; Burge v Swarbrick (2007) 232 CLR 336 at 344 [15]; [2007] HCA 17; Phonographic Performance Co of Australia Ltd v The Commonwealth (2012) 86 ALJR 335 at 352 [109] per Crennan a......
  • Asic v Administrative Appeals Tribunal
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • IceTV Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • April 22, 2009
    ...Telephone Service Co, Inc 499 US 340 at 357 (1991). 95 Copyright Act RSC 1985, ch C- 42, s 2. 100 Burge v Swarbrick (2007) 232 CLR 336 ; [2007] HCA 17. 96 8 Fed Cas 615 97 (1917) 23 CLR 49 at 56; [1917] HCA 14. 98 See Commonwealth Industrial Gases Ltd v MWA Holdings Pty Ltd (1970) 180 CLR 1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 firm's commentaries
3 books & journal articles
  • Intellectual property
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • April 13, 2020
    ...the operation of Canadian copyright law). As to the meaning of the expression “artistic works” generally, see Burge v Swarbrick [2007] HCA 17. See also Bridge, Candi and Wyburn, “Copyright and Architecture” (1987) 3 BCL 94; Wheeler, “Copyright in Construction Drawings and Works of Architect......
  • Works of Artistic Craftsmanship in the High Court of Australia: The Exception as Paradigm Copyright Work
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 36-3, September 2008
    • September 1, 2008
    ...Senior Research Associate (and Interim Director), Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre. Email: justine.pila@law.ox.ac.uk. 1 (2007) 232 CLR 336 ('Burge'). 2 [1976] AC 64 ('Hensher'). 3 Burge (2007) 232 CLR 336, 353 (quoting from Coogi Australia Pty Ltd v Hysport International Pty Ltd......
  • An Intentional View of the Copyright Work
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 71-4, July 2008
    • July 1, 2008
    ...of their client, Mr Goddard.70Cast in that light, the decision recalls the later principle of Laddie J in Metix63 BurgevSwarbrick [2007] HCA 17 at [62].64 See [2007] HCA 17 at [60] (making it clear that whatever the case at the turn of the nineteenthcentury, in 2007 ‘aprototype. . . mightqu......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT