Burke v Lfot Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2000-0818 FCA B
Year2000
Date2000
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
21 cases
  • Nmfm Property Pty Ltd v Citibank Ltd (No 10)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Marlborough District Council v Altimarloch Joint Venture Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 5 March 2012
    ...At 378. 236 Lord Goff and Gareth Jones The Law of Restitution (7th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2007) at 385. 237 Burke v LFOT Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1155, (2000) 178 ALR 238 At [130]. 239 Lingard v Bromley (1812) 1 V & B 114; 35 ER 45 at 45 per Grant MR. 240 Burke v LFOT Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 17,......
  • Alexander v Perpetual Trustees Wa Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 12 February 2004
    ... ... Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd v Seltsam Pty Ltd (1998) 196 CLR 53 ; Burke v LFOT Pty Ltd (2002) 209 CLR 282 ... 50 Barnett, ‘The Uneasy Position of Unjust Enrichment After ... ...
  • Friend v Brooker
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 28 May 2009
    ...exonerating [Mr Brooker] from the plight he finds himself in at the end of the venture’. 33 The President referred to the holding in Burke v LFOT Pty Ltd15 that to found a claim to contribution there must be a ‘common obligation’, but also emphasised that ‘an equitable principle such as con......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT