Butera v Director Ofpublic Prosecutions (Vic)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Judgment Date1987
Neutral Citation1987-1015 HCA C,[1987] HCA 58,1987-1202 HCA A,[1987] HCA 56,1987-1208 HCA A
Date1987
Year1987

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
163 cases
  • Eastman v R
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Accc v World Netsafe Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Brian Rattigan v DPP
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 7 May 2008
    ...[1994] 2 I.R. 465; [1994] 1 I.L.R.M. 435. Director of Public Prosecutions v. Haugh [2000] 1 I.R. 184. Hinch v. Attorney General (1987) 164 C.L.R. 15. P.M. v. Director of Public Prosecutions [2006] IESC 22, [2006] 3 I.R. 172.; [2006] 2 I.L.R.M. 361. The People (Director of Public Prosecution......
  • Clubb v Edwards
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 April 2019
    ...178 at 219–220 [89]–[92]. 44 (2015) 257 CLR 178 at 220 [90]. 45 (1978) 142 CLR 1 at 39, 43; [1978] HCA 43. See also at 63–64, 98–99. 46 (1987) 164 CLR 15 at 85–87; [1987] HCA 56. See also at 26–27, 41–43, 50, 47 (2011) 243 CLR 506 at 536–537 [32]; [2011] HCA 4. 48 (2015) 257 CLR 178 at 219 ......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Construction & Infrastructure - What's News - 9 December 2014
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 16 December 2014
    ...298 COSTS - Civil contempt - Whether indemnity costs should necessarily be awarded at appellate level - Hinch v Attorney-General (Vic) [1987] HCA 56; (1987) 164 CLR 15 - Costs to be assessed on standard basis. COSTS - Criminal contempt - Section 409 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009, discu......
  • Corporations beware! The High Court delivers - Contempt 101
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 26 June 2015
    ...in meeting the higher burden of proof. Footnotes 1 [2015] HCA 21. 2[2015] HCA 21 at [12] 3 Referring to Hinch v Attorney-General (Vict) (1987) 164 CLR 15 4 Re Colina; Ex parte Torney (1999) 200 CLR 386; cited by French CJ, Kiefel, Bell, Gageler and Keane JJ at 5 Per Nettle J at [65] citing ......
  • Can The Commonwealth Be Charged With Contempt Of Court?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 July 2009
    ...on to note that the differences were largely illusory, and endorsed the comments of Justice Deane in Hinch v Attorney-General (Vic) (1987) 164 CLR 15, 49 "that proceedings for contempt 'must realistically be seen as criminal in nature'". Thus, in Justice Biscoe's view in Arnold, unless a st......
6 books & journal articles