Butler v Fairclough
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 1917 |
| Neutral Citation | [1917] HCA 9,1917-0329 HCA A |
| Date | 1917 |
| Year | 1917 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
112 cases
- Pemungut Hasil Tanah, Kota Tinggi and Johore Sugar Plantations and Industries Bhd v Pemungut Hasil Tanah, Kota Tinggi; United Malayan Banking Corporation Bhd
- Bank of Tokyo Ltd v Mohd Zaini bin Arshad (Maria Pragasam, Intervenor)
- Low Yat Holdings Sdn Bhd and Another; Templeton and Others
- Inter-Continental Mining Company Sdn Bhd v Societe Des Etains De Bayas Tudjuh
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Contract Damages, Corrective Justice and Punishment
...For Australia, see Gray vMotorAccident Commission[1998] HCA70; (1998) 196 CLR1, 6^7,citi ngGri⁄th CJ in Butler vFaircl ough (1917) 23 CLR 78,89.In New Zealand, notwithstanding a num-ber of High Court dec isions that favoured the availability of punitive damages in co ntract(s eeTa kand CoIn......
-
AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF EXEMPLARY DAMAGES IN AUSTRALIA.
...and Luntz (n 2) 769. (23) Gray (n 3) 7 [14] (Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ). (24) Ibid 9-10 [22]. (25) Butler v Fairclough (1917) 23 CLR 78, 89 (Griffith CJ), quoted in ibid 6 [13]. There may, however, be some room for argument both as a matter of precedent and in principle: see, ......