C A Henschke & Company v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1999-1111 FCA D,2000-1031 FCA A |
| Year | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Federal Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
32 cases
- Ami Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v Bade Medical Institute (Aust.) Pty Ltd (No 2)
-
Henley Arch Pty Ltd v Henley Constructions Pty Ltd
...in the same way as in a passing off suit. This passage was approved by the Full Court in C A Henschke & Co v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1539; 52 IPR 42 (Ryan, Branson, Lehane JJ) at It may be noted that the language of s 10 of the Trade Marks Act includes that a trade mark is take......
- Pfizer Products Inc. v Karam
-
PDP Capital Pty Ltd v Grasshopper Ventures Pty Ltd
...Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v F H Faulding & Co Limited [2000] FCA 316; (2000) 97 FCR 524 C A Henschke & Co v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1539; (2000) 52 IPR 42 Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Ltd [2000] HCA 12; (2000) 202 CLR 45 Carnival Cruise Lines Inc v Sitmar......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Key case considers important trademark issues
...likelihood of imperfect recollection" 4. Consequently, their Honours chose to apply Henschke & Co v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1539; 52 IPR 42 in determining that reputation is not relevant when determining a trademark infringement Ultimately, the Full Court went on to determi......
-
Fur flying in fashion cases: a roundup of last year's trade mark disputes involving fashion brands
...quoting from the judgment of the Full Court in CA Henschke & Co v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd (2000) 52 IPR 42; (2000) AIPC 91-640; [2000] FCA 1539; 6Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (2009) 81 IPR 354; [2009] FCA 606; BC200904981. See also C Logan "Mars fail to get up in get......
1 books & journal articles
-
Reputation in Trade Mark Infringement: Why Some Courts Think it Matters and Why it Should Not
...55 See Registered Trade Mark No 63697 which is a contour drawing of a bottle without any mention of or reference to colour or words. 56 [2000] FCA 1539 (Unreported, Ryan, Branson and Lehane JJ, 31 October 2000). 57 Ibid [53]. 2010 Reputation in Trade Mark Infringement 251 __________________......