Cabal v United Mexican States
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Kirby J,Gleeson CJ,McHugh,Gummow JJ |
| Judgment Date | 24 October 2001 |
| Neutral Citation | 2001-0629 HCA A,[2001] HCA 42,2001-0731 HCA A,[2001] HCA 60 |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | M74/2001,M39/2001 |
| Date | 24 October 2001 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
90 cases
- Republic of Croatia v Snedden
- Republic of Croatia v Snedden
- ACCC v Chaste Corporation Pty Ltd
-
Plaintiff M168/10 v The Commonwealth
...470 at 474 [15]–[16] per McHugh J; 177 ALR 491 at 495–496; [2000] HCA 67. 2United Mexican States v Cabal (2001) 209 CLR 165 at 180 [37]; [2001] HCA 60; see also Tait v The Queen (1962) 108 CLR 620 at 624; [1962] HCA 3 (2006) 227 CLR 57 at 81–84 [65]–[72]; [2006] HCA 46. 4 (1968) 118 CLR 61......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Human Rights in the High Court of Australia, 1976-2003: The Righting of Australian Law?
...re: s 51(xxxi) of the Constitution); Cheung v R (2001) 209 CLR 1 (Kirby J re: s 80 of the Constitution); Cabal v United Mexican States (2001) 180 ALR 593 (Kirby J re: constitutional power of the High Court to grant bail); Austin v Commonwealth (2003) 215 CLR 185 (Kirby J re: constitutional ......
-
THE KIRK STRUCTURAL CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATION.
...201 [23] (French CJ, Kiefel, Bell and Keane JJ). (87) Boilermakers' Case (n 50) 278 (Dixon CJ, McTiernan, Fullagar and Kitto JJ). (88) (2001) 209 CLR 165, 180 [37] (Gleeson CJ, McHugh and Gummow (89) Will Bateman and James Stellios, 'Chapter III of the Constitution, Federal Jurisdiction and......