Calma v Sesar

JurisdictionNorthern Territory
Date1992
Year1992
CourtSupreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 cases
  • Takamore v Clarke COA CA
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 23 Noviembre 2011
    ...2 NZLR 236 (HC) at 252. 176 Williams v Williams, above n 170; Murdoch v Rhind, above n 170. 177 Williams v Williams, ibid, at 664. 178 Calma v Sesar (1992) 106 FLR 446 (NTSC) at 452; Hartshorne v Gardner [2008] EWHC B3 (Ch) at 179 R v Stewart (1840) 12 Ad & E 773 at 778 per Lord Denman CJ.......
  • Monalisa Veronica Walker v Deno Alexander Smith Jr
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 30 Noviembre 2021
    ...a grant, and the court normally breaks the impasse by recourse to factors which have been set out in case law. In Calma v Sesar and anor (1992) 2 NTLR 37, one of the cases relied on by the defendant, Martin J [at 42] observed: “It requires that the Court resolve the argument in a practical ......
  • Hartshorne v Gardner
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 Marzo 2008
    ... ... 4. In the Australian case of Calma v Sesar(1992) 2 NTLR 37 the judge, Martin J, declined to hear evidence about the deceased's childhood relationships with members of his family ... ...
  • Derick Hartshorne v Gillian Helen Monica Gardner
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 Marzo 2008
    ... ... 4 In the Australian case of Calma v. Sesar (1992) 2 NTLR 37 the judge, Martin J, declined to hear evidence about the deceased's childhood relationships with members of his family ... ...
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT