Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | French CJ.,Gummow,Hayne,Heydon,Kiefel JJ. |
| Judgment Date | 29 July 2009 |
| Neutral Citation | 2009-0729 HCA A,[2009] HCA 25 |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | S435/2008 |
| Date | 29 July 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
295 cases
5 firm's commentaries
-
Are 'Entire Agreement Clauses' - Entirely Reliable?
...Act 2010 (Cth) Schedule 2, Part 2-1, s 18 (previously Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52). 3 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 25 at [130]. 4 See Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd v Henjo Investments Pty Ltd (1987) ATPR 40-783; Warwick Entertainment Centre Pty Ltd v Alpine Ho......
-
W&I Insurance Claims: Tips On Early Intervention And Current Trends In Australia
...(1972) 127 CLR 454; Monarch Steamship Co Ltd v Karlshamns Oljefabriker (A/B) (1949) AC 196; Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 25. Under a share sale agreement, the measure of loss is calculated as the difference between the value of the share(s) as warranted and the true ......
-
The trouble with agreements to agree and the obligation to act in good faith
...Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) [1982] HCA 24 3 Hart v MacDonald [1910] HCA 13 4 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 25; Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Schedule 2, Part 2-1, s The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject ma......
-
How Oppressive Can The Majority Be?
...not be oppressive? These issues were considered in the recent High Court of Australia case Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 25. Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 25 The High Court of Australia recently handed down its decision in Campbell v Backoffice ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
CONSUMER PROTECTION, STATUTE AND
...Pty Ltd[2004] HCA 60; (2004) 218 CLR 592 at 604, [36], per Gleeson CJ and Hayne and Heydon JJ; Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd[2009] HCA 25; (2009) 238 CLR 304 at 319, [35], per French CJ. 63Freely Pte Ltd v Ong Kaili[2010] 2 SLR 1065 at [45]. See also Parkdale Custom Built Furnit......
-
Causation in Securities and Financial Product Disclosure Cases: An Analysis and Critique
...1974 (Cth) s 82(1).89. See Australian Consumer Law s 236(1).90. Eg, Wardley, above n 85, 525; Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304, 341[102] (Gummow, Hayne, Heydon and Kiefel JJ) (‘Campbell’).91. Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (1998) 196 CLR 494, 510 [38] (McHugh......