Campomar Sociedad Ltda v Nike International Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gaudron,McHugh,Gummow,Kirby,Hayne,Callinan JJ
Judgment Date09 March 2000
Neutral Citation[2000] HCA 12,2000-0309 HCA C
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberS41/1999
Date09 March 2000
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
342 cases
2 firm's commentaries
7 books & journal articles
  • CONSUMER PROTECTION, STATUTE AND
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...60; (2004) 218 CLR 592 at 604, [36]–[37], per Gleeson CJ and Hayne and Heydon JJ. 62Campomar Sociedad Limitada v Nike International Ltd[2000] HCA 12; (2000) 202 CLR 45 at 85, [103]. See also Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu(1982) 149 CLR 191 at 199, per Gibbs CJ; Butcher v Lac......
  • Whither breach of confidence: a right of privacy for Australia?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 2, August 2002
    • 1 August 2002
    ...as the High Court has generally observed with respect to conceded arguments: see Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 45, (64) [2001] QB 967. (65) See above n 37. Relative secrecy is the general standard of secrecy that applies under the equitable doctrine: se......
  • The Intersection between Registered and Unregistered Trade Marks
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 35-3, September 2007
    • 1 September 2007
    ...or deceptive conduct' under the TPA, and was reaffirmed by the High Court in Campomar Sociedad Limitada v Nike International Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 45, 87 [106], it has been the subject of judicial and academic criticism: see, eg, Taco Co of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177, ......
  • Trade marks for tobacco products as constitutional property: Australian plain packaging legislation
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...the state acquiring anything, as67JT International supra note 7 para 68, citing Campomar Sociedad Limitada v NikeInternational Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 45 para 42; Health World Ltd v Shin-Sun Australia Pty Ltd(2010) 240 CLR 590 para 29; Johnson & Johnson Australia Pty Ltd v Sterling Pharmaceutica......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT