Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Limited (No 5)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFOSTER J
Judgment Date01 April 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCA 637
Date01 April 2020
CourtFederal Court


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Limited (No 5) [2020] FCA 637


File numbers:





NSD 1307 of 2015NSD 1308 of 2015NSD 1459 of 2015NSD 1472 of 2015NSD 1473 of 2015



Judge:

FOSTER J



Date of Orders:

1 April 2020



Date of publication of Reasons:

13 May 2020



Catchwords:

CONSUMER LAW – representative proceedings – whether the Court should approve the settlement of five class actions brought under Pt IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) in which Australian purchasers of Volkswagen-branded, Audi-branded and Skoda-branded diesel-powered motor vehicles sued for (inter alia) compensation for loss and damage allegedly suffered by them as a consequence of the respondents (Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft and certain of its related corporations) installing illegal sophisticated two-mode software in the engines of such vehicles designed to circumvent Australian emissions standards in respect of NOx – whether, in addition, the Court should make a common fund order either at the instigation of the litigation funder of two of those class actions or at the instigation of the applicants in those two class actions – whether, in the event that the Court declines to make any common fund order, the Court should make a funding equalisation order in respect of percentage commission payments and project management fees which a small number of group members in the classes specified in two of those class actions agreed to make to that litigation funder



Legislation:

Australian Consumer Law, ss 18, 29(1), 54(1) and 106(1)

Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 165, 166, 173 and 183

Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 135

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 17, 20(1A), 23, 33C, 33M, 33N, 33V, 33Z, 33ZB, 33ZF, 37AF and 37AG

Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 (Cth), ss 5, 7, 10A, 14 and 18

Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52, 53(a), 53(c), 65C(1) and 74D

Federal Court Rules 2011, r 9.05

Australian Design Rule 79—Emission Control for Light Vehicles

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation 83, Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with Regard to the Emission of Pollutants According to Engine Fuel Requirements

18 U.S.C. §371

18 U.S.C. §542

18 U.S.C. §1343

18 U.S.C. §1512(c)

42 U.S.C. §7413(c)(2)(A)



Cases cited:

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft [2019] FCA 2166

Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2019] FCA 2216

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cascade Coal Pty Ltd (No 4) [2018] FCA 1243

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Richards [2013] FCAFC 89

Blairgowrie Trading Ltd v Allco Finance Group Ltd (In Liq) (2015) 325 ALR 539

Blairgowrie Trading Ltd v Allco Finance Group Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed (In Liq) (No 3) (2017) 343 ALR 476

BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster (2019) 366 ALR 171

BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster (2019) 374 ALR 627

Camilleri v The Trust Company (Nominees) Limited [2015] FCA 1468

Caason Investments Pty Ltd v International Litigation Partners No 3 Ltd (2018) 265 FCR 487

Central Railroad & Banking Co of Georgia v Pettus 113 U.S. 116 (1885)

Clime Capital Limited v UGL Pty Limited [2020] FCA 66

Clime Capital Limited v UGL Pty Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 257

Crossley and Ors v Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft and Ors [2020] EWHC 783 (QB)

Evans v Davantage Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 473

Farey v National Australia Bank Ltd [2014] FCA 1242

Fisher (Trustee for the Tramik Super Fund Trust) v Vocus Group Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 579

Haselhurst v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd (t/as Toyota Australia) [2020] NSWCA 66

Inabu Pty Ltd as trustee for the Alidas Superannuation Fund v CIMIC Group Limited [2020] FCA 510

Kelly v Willmott Forests Limited (In Liq) (No 4) (2016) 335 ALR 439

Lenthall v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) [2020] FCA 423

Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Limited v S&P Global Inc [2018] FCA 379

McKay Super Solutions Pty Ltd (Trustee) v Bellamy’s Australia Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 461

McKenzie v Cash Converters International Ltd (No 3) [2019] FCA 10

McMullin v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd (1998) 84 FCR 1

Modtech Engineering Pty Ltd v GPT Management Holdings Ltd [2013] FCA 626

Money Max Int Pty Ltd v QBE Insurance Group Ltd (2016) 245 FCR 191

National Bolivian Navigation Company v Wilson (1880) 5 App Cas 176

Pathway Investments Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd (No 3) [2012] VSC 625

Pearson v State of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 619

Rushleigh Services Pty Ltd v Forge Group Limited (In Liq) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2019] FCA 2113

Trustees v Greenough 105 U.S. 527 (1881)

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 265 FCR 21



Date of hearing:

26 March 2020



Date of last submissions:

31 March 2020



Registry:

New South Wales



Division:

General Division



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub-area:

Regulator and Consumer Protection



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

476



Counsel for the Applicants in NSD 1307 of 2015 and NSD 1308 of 2015:

Dr P Cashman and Mr R White



Solicitor for the Applicants in NSD 1307 of 2015 and NSD 1308 of 2015:

Bannister Law



Counsel for the Applicants in NSD 1459 of 2015, NSD 1472 of 2015 and NSD 1473 of 2015:

Mr CA Moore SC, Mr AM Hochroth and Ms J Taylor



Solicitor for the Applicants in NSD 1459 of 2015, NSD 1472 of 2015 and NSD 1473 of 2015:

Maurice Blackburn Lawyers



Counsel for the Respondents in NSD 1307 of 2015, NSD 1308 of 2015, NSD 1459 of 2015, NSD 1472 of 2015 and NSD 1473 of 2015:

Mr G Rich SC and Mr IJM Ahmed


...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 cases
  • Parkin v Boral Limited (Class Closure)
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 28 March 2022
    ...Insurance Board [2009] HCA 47; 239 CLR 390 Capic v Ford Motor Company (No 2) [2016] FCA 1178 Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] FCA 637 Court v Spotless Group Holdings Ltd [2020] FCA 1730 Dyczynski v Gibson [2020] FCAFC 120; 280 FCR 583 Earglow Pty Ltd v Newcrest Mining Ltd [2015......
  • Davaria Pty Limited v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 3 November 2020
    ...v BMW Australia Ltd [2020] NSWCA 272 Caason Investments Pty Limited v Cao (No 2) [2018] FCA 527 Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] FCA 637 Clime Capital Limited v UGL Pty Limited [2020] FCA 66 Davaria Pty Limited v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Limited (No 7) [2020] FCA 1487 Dillon v RBS G......
  • Court v Spotless Group Holdings Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 9 September 2020
    ...[2015] FCA 1468 Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 41; (2006) 229 CLR 386 Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] FCA 637 Clarke v Sandhurst Trustees Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 511 Clime Capital Limited v UGL Pty Limited [2020] FCA 66 Darwalla Milling Co Pty Lt......
  • Davaria Pty Limited v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd (No 13)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 14 February 2023
    ...under s 5(2) – held: Federal Court of Australia has no power to make a common fund order – Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] FCA 637 applied – whether, if the court did have such power, a common fund order should be made in any event – whether a fund equalisation order should be......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • The COVID-19 Pandemic, the Courts and Online Hearings: Maintaining Open Justice, Procedural Fairness and Impartiality
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 49-2, June 2021
    • 1 June 2021
    ...for the Tramik Super Fund Trust) v Vocus Group Limited [No 2] [2020] FCA 579, [12].45. Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Limited [No 5] [2020] FCA 637, [31] (‘Cantor’).46. See, eg, Kemp (n 23).47. Supreme Court of Victoria (n 22) 4. See also Supreme Court of Victoria, Supreme Court Changes in Res......
  • AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE ON COSTS IN AUSTRALIAN CLASS ACTIONS.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 3, August 2022
    • 1 August 2022
    ...Class Action Settlements' (2018) 92(9) Australian Law Journal 716, 719-20. (101) See, eg, Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd [No 5] [2020] FCA 637, [241]-[242] (Foster J); Kelly (n 48) 447-8 [27]-[28] (Murphy J); Stanford v DePuy International Ltd [No 6] [2016] FCA 1452, [82]-[83] (Wigney (102......