Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Limited (No 5)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | FOSTER J |
| Judgment Date | 01 April 2020 |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] FCA 637 |
| Date | 01 April 2020 |
| Court | Federal Court |
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Limited (No 5) [2020] FCA 637
|
File numbers: |
NSD 1307 of 2015NSD 1308 of 2015NSD 1459 of 2015NSD 1472 of 2015NSD 1473 of 2015 |
|
|
|
|
Judge: |
FOSTER J |
|
|
|
|
Date of Orders: |
1 April 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Date of publication of Reasons: |
13 May 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Catchwords: |
CONSUMER LAW – representative proceedings – whether the Court should approve the settlement of five class actions brought under Pt IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) in which Australian purchasers of Volkswagen-branded, Audi-branded and Skoda-branded diesel-powered motor vehicles sued for (inter alia) compensation for loss and damage allegedly suffered by them as a consequence of the respondents (Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft and certain of its related corporations) installing illegal sophisticated two-mode software in the engines of such vehicles designed to circumvent Australian emissions standards in respect of NOx – whether, in addition, the Court should make a common fund order either at the instigation of the litigation funder of two of those class actions or at the instigation of the applicants in those two class actions – whether, in the event that the Court declines to make any common fund order, the Court should make a funding equalisation order in respect of percentage commission payments and project management fees which a small number of group members in the classes specified in two of those class actions agreed to make to that litigation funder |
|
|
|
|
Legislation: |
Australian Consumer Law, ss 18, 29(1), 54(1) and 106(1) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 165, 166, 173 and 183 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 135 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 17, 20(1A), 23, 33C, 33M, 33N, 33V, 33Z, 33ZB, 33ZF, 37AF and 37AG Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 (Cth), ss 5, 7, 10A, 14 and 18 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52, 53(a), 53(c), 65C(1) and 74D Federal Court Rules 2011, r 9.05 Australian Design Rule 79—Emission Control for Light Vehicles United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation 83, Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with Regard to the Emission of Pollutants According to Engine Fuel Requirements 42 U.S.C. §7413(c)(2)(A) |
|
|
|
|
Cases cited: |
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft [2019] FCA 2166 Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2019] FCA 2216 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cascade Coal Pty Ltd (No 4) [2018] FCA 1243 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Richards [2013] FCAFC 89 Blairgowrie Trading Ltd v Allco Finance Group Ltd (In Liq) (2015) 325 ALR 539 Blairgowrie Trading Ltd v Allco Finance Group Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed (In Liq) (No 3) (2017) 343 ALR 476 BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster (2019) 366 ALR 171 BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster (2019) 374 ALR 627 Camilleri v The Trust Company (Nominees) Limited [2015] FCA 1468 Caason Investments Pty Ltd v International Litigation Partners No 3 Ltd (2018) 265 FCR 487 Central Railroad & Banking Co of Georgia v Pettus 113 U.S. 116 (1885) Clime Capital Limited v UGL Pty Limited [2020] FCA 66 Clime Capital Limited v UGL Pty Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 257 Crossley and Ors v Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft and Ors [2020] EWHC 783 (QB) Evans v Davantage Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 473 Farey v National Australia Bank Ltd [2014] FCA 1242 Fisher (Trustee for the Tramik Super Fund Trust) v Vocus Group Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 579 Haselhurst v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd (t/as Toyota Australia) [2020] NSWCA 66 Inabu Pty Ltd as trustee for the Alidas Superannuation Fund v CIMIC Group Limited [2020] FCA 510 Kelly v Willmott Forests Limited (In Liq) (No 4) (2016) 335 ALR 439 Lenthall v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) [2020] FCA 423 Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Limited v S&P Global Inc [2018] FCA 379 McKay Super Solutions Pty Ltd (Trustee) v Bellamy’s Australia Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 461 McKenzie v Cash Converters International Ltd (No 3) [2019] FCA 10 McMullin v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd (1998) 84 FCR 1 Modtech Engineering Pty Ltd v GPT Management Holdings Ltd [2013] FCA 626 Money Max Int Pty Ltd v QBE Insurance Group Ltd (2016) 245 FCR 191 National Bolivian Navigation Company v Wilson (1880) 5 App Cas 176 Pathway Investments Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd (No 3) [2012] VSC 625 Pearson v State of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 619 Rushleigh Services Pty Ltd v Forge Group Limited (In Liq) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2019] FCA 2113 Trustees v Greenough 105 U.S. 527 (1881) Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 265 FCR 21 |
|
|
|
|
Date of hearing: |
26 March 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Date of last submissions: |
31 March 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Registry: |
New South Wales |
|
|
|
|
Division: |
General Division |
|
|
|
|
National Practice Area: |
Commercial and Corporations |
|
|
|
|
Sub-area: |
Regulator and Consumer Protection |
|
|
|
|
Category: |
Catchwords |
|
|
|
|
Number of paragraphs: |
476 |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Applicants in NSD 1307 of 2015 and NSD 1308 of 2015: |
Dr P Cashman and Mr R White |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Applicants in NSD 1307 of 2015 and NSD 1308 of 2015: |
Bannister Law |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Applicants in NSD 1459 of 2015, NSD 1472 of 2015 and NSD 1473 of 2015: |
Mr CA Moore SC, Mr AM Hochroth and Ms J Taylor |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Applicants in NSD 1459 of 2015, NSD 1472 of 2015 and NSD 1473 of 2015: |
Maurice Blackburn Lawyers |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Respondents in NSD 1307 of 2015, NSD 1308 of 2015, NSD 1459 of 2015, NSD 1472 of 2015 and NSD 1473 of 2015: |
Mr G Rich SC and Mr IJM Ahmed |
|
|
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Parkin v Boral Limited (Class Closure)
...Insurance Board [2009] HCA 47; 239 CLR 390 Capic v Ford Motor Company (No 2) [2016] FCA 1178 Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] FCA 637 Court v Spotless Group Holdings Ltd [2020] FCA 1730 Dyczynski v Gibson [2020] FCAFC 120; 280 FCR 583 Earglow Pty Ltd v Newcrest Mining Ltd [2015......
-
Davaria Pty Limited v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd
...v BMW Australia Ltd [2020] NSWCA 272 Caason Investments Pty Limited v Cao (No 2) [2018] FCA 527 Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] FCA 637 Clime Capital Limited v UGL Pty Limited [2020] FCA 66 Davaria Pty Limited v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Limited (No 7) [2020] FCA 1487 Dillon v RBS G......
-
Court v Spotless Group Holdings Limited
...[2015] FCA 1468 Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 41; (2006) 229 CLR 386 Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] FCA 637 Clarke v Sandhurst Trustees Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 511 Clime Capital Limited v UGL Pty Limited [2020] FCA 66 Darwalla Milling Co Pty Lt......
-
Davaria Pty Limited v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd (No 13)
...under s 5(2) – held: Federal Court of Australia has no power to make a common fund order – Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] FCA 637 applied – whether, if the court did have such power, a common fund order should be made in any event – whether a fund equalisation order should be......
-
The COVID-19 Pandemic, the Courts and Online Hearings: Maintaining Open Justice, Procedural Fairness and Impartiality
...for the Tramik Super Fund Trust) v Vocus Group Limited [No 2] [2020] FCA 579, [12].45. Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Limited [No 5] [2020] FCA 637, [31] (‘Cantor’).46. See, eg, Kemp (n 23).47. Supreme Court of Victoria (n 22) 4. See also Supreme Court of Victoria, Supreme Court Changes in Res......
-
AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE ON COSTS IN AUSTRALIAN CLASS ACTIONS.
...Class Action Settlements' (2018) 92(9) Australian Law Journal 716, 719-20. (101) See, eg, Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd [No 5] [2020] FCA 637, [241]-[242] (Foster J); Kelly (n 48) 447-8 [27]-[28] (Murphy J); Stanford v DePuy International Ltd [No 6] [2016] FCA 1452, [82]-[83] (Wigney (102......