Ccom Pty Ltd v Jiejing Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1992-0708 FCA A
Date1992
Year1992
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
12 cases
  • Suzlon Energy Ltd v Bangad
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 February 2018
    ...Ltd (1995) 13 WAR 407 at 436; Pelechowski (1999) 198 CLR 435 at 485 [149] per Kirby J. 115 See generally CCOM Pty Ltd v Jiejing Pty Ltd (1992) 36 FCR 524 at 530–531; Chan v Chen (No 2) [2007] VSC 24 at 116 See and compare Patrick Stevedores v MUA (1998) 195 CLR 1 at 46–47 [78]–[79] per Bren......
  • Collins v Northern Territory
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Jorgensen v Fair Work Ombudsman
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 8 July 2019
    ...v Sigalla (No 3) [2010] NSWSC 1076 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 18; 198 CLR 380 CCOM Pty Ltd v Jiejing Pty Limited [1992] FCA 325; 36 FCR 524 Clampett v Attorney-General (Cth) [2009] FCAFC 151; 181 FCR 473 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd......
  • Get Started for Free