Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 1998 |
| Neutral Citation | 1998-0520 HCA B,[1998] HCA 37 |
| Date | 1998 |
| Year | 1998 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
106 cases
-
Ganley v RTE
...being that Mr Ganley is a fantasist when it comes to his purported business experiences. f. Chakravarti v. Advertiser Newspapers Limited (1998) HCA 37 86 This was a decision of the High Court of Australia in which the defendants pleaded, inter alia, that certain impugned newspaper articles......
- Dato' Sri Dr Mohamad Salleh bin Ismail and Another v Nurul Izzah binti Anwar and Another
-
Dr Ashti Hawrami v Journalism Development Network, Inc.
...… 35 The position, therefore, is, as Kirby J observed in the High Court of Australia in Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Ltd (1998) 193 CLR 519, para 153 that: ‘Excessive commentary or misleading headlines which amount to commentary run the risk of depriving the text of the quality of fa......
-
Curistan v Times Newspapers Ltd
...and accuracy rests on the defendant. 44 Reliance is placed on Dingle v Associated Newspapers; dicta by Kirby J in Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Limited [1998] HCA 37 and a decision of mine in Henry v BBC [2005] EWHC 2787 (QB). 45 The first point made by Mr Parkes is that, when one com......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
REPUTATION AND DEFAMATORY MEANING ON THE INTERNET
...Law to Twibel Claims”(2013) 73 La L Rev 559 at 587–588. 161Charleston v News Group Newspapers Ltd[1995] 2 AC 65. 162[1995] 2 AC 65. 163193 CLR 519 at [134]. 164[2015] SGHC 38. 165[2012] EWHC B3. 166McGrath v Dawkins[2012] EWHC B3 at [53]. 167McGrath v Dawkins[2012] EWHC B3 at [53]. 16829 Mi......
-
Human Rights in the High Court of Australia, 1976-2003: The Righting of Australian Law?
...Act 1975 (Cth) in criminal proceedings in the Magistrates' Court and County Court of Victoria); Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Ltd (1998) 193 CLR 519 (Brennan CJ and McHugh J re: defamation law); Sinanovic v R (1998) 154 ALR 702 (Kirby J re: fairness in criminal trials); DPP (SA) v B (......
-
The Reformulated Contextual Truth Defence: More Radical That First Appears
...Pty Ltd (1992) 107 ACTR 1, 21–7; Grundmannv Georgeson [1996] Aust Torts Rep 81–396, 63, 513; Hart v Wrenn [1995] 5 NTLR 17, [11].12. (1998) 193 CLR 519, 529 [11] (‘Chakravarti’).13. Ibid 527–528 [8], 529 [13].208 Federal Law Review That view was not endorsed by the remaining members of the ......