Chan v Zacharia
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 1984 |
| Neutral Citation | [1984] HCA 36,1984-0607 HCA A |
| Year | 1984 |
| Date | 1984 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
224 cases
-
John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd
...corporate joint venture or partnership. 58 Two other authorities on which the Court of Appeal relied may also be distinguished. One was Chan v Zacharia26, dealing with the content of fiduciary duties between partners after the partnership ended. Here there is no partnership, and the Court o......
- Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2)
-
Jeremy Hosking v Marathon Asset Management LLP
...the provision of services, it should be liable to forfeiture, and that is said to chime with the "no profit" rule (as to which, see e.g. Chan v Zacharia (1984) 154 CLR 178, at 199); any potential for unfairness is removed by the requirement that forfeiture should not be disproportionate or ......
-
Anthony Kleanthous v (1) Theodoros Paphitis (2) Malcolm Stanley Cooke and Others
...and "no profit" rules. The effect of these was summarised in these terms by Deane J in the High Court of Australia in Chan v Zacharia (1984) 154 CLR 178: "Stated comprehensively in terms of the liability to account, the principle of equity is that a person who is under a fiduciary obligatio......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Stronger Super: a new dawn for trustee governance
...and Trusts (1989), 1. 39 These duties are well established; see for example Phipps v Boardman [1967] 2 AC 46 and Chan v Zacharia (1984) 154 CLR 178. 40 Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corp (No 9) (2008) 225 FLR 1, [4552] per Owen J. 41 R P Austin, 'Moulding the Content of Fiduciar......
12 books & journal articles
-
UNAUTHORISED FIDUCIARY GAINS AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST
...37 Aust Bar Rev 231. 19(1915) 20 CLR 285. 20(1916) 22 CLR 402. 21(1936) 54 CLR 583. 22Furs Ltd v Tomkies(1936) 54 CLR 583 at 592. 23(1984) 154 CLR 178, applying Keech v Sandford(1726) Sel Cas Ch 61. 24 See, eg, Keith Henry & Co Pty Ltd v Stuart Walker & Co Pty Ltd(1958) 100 CLR 342 at 350; ......
-
SELF-DEALING AND NO-PROFIT RULES: COMPANIES ACT 2016
...on appeal but on a different point, see FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2015] AC 250. 3 Chan v Zacharia (1984) 53 ALR 417. 4 Bell v Lever Bros Ltd [1932] AC 161 at 194, per Lord Blanesburgh. 5 Act 777. 6 Companies Act 2016 (Act 777) s 221 (governing contracts and pro......
-
NAVIGATING THE MAZE
...Dwyer(1994–1995) 182 CLR 544 at 557; (1995) 128 ALR 201 at 209. 180Novoship (UK) Ltd v Nikitin[2014] EWCA Civ 908 at [96] and [109]. 181(1984) 154 CLR 178. 182Kak Loui Chan v Zacharia(1984) 154 CLR 178 at 204–205, cited in Warman International Ltd v Dwyer[1995] 128 ALR 201 at 210. 183 See a......
-
RECONFIGURING THE NO CONFLICT RULE
...[2006] FSR 17 at [1306]; Quarter Master UK v PykeUNK[2005] 1 BCLC 245 at [55]. 5Bristol and West BS v MothewELR[1998] Ch 1 at 18. 6(1984) 154 CLR 178 at 198; and see King Productions Ltd v WarrenUNK[2000] 1 BCLC 607. 7[1967] 2 AC 134, [1942] 1 All ER 378, HL. 8 See too Boardman v PhippsELR[......
Request a trial to view additional results