Chappel v Hart
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1998-0902 HCA A,[1998] HCA 55 |
| Date | 1997 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
228 cases
- Kestrel Holdings Pty Ltd v Apf Properties Pty Ltd
- Cubillo v Commonwealth
- Mullins Wheels Pty Ltd v Minister for Customs and Consumer Affairs
- Montague Mining Pty Ltd v Gore
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
What is an award of damages?
...Law (Sch 2 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)). Footnotes i Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 at 642-3. ii Chappel v Hart [1998] HCA 55; 195 CLR 232; 156 ALR 517; 72 ALJR 1344 (2 September iii Re Henjo Investments Pty Limited; Henry Saade and Saade Developments Pty Limited v......
-
What is an award of damages?
...Law (Sch 2 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)). Footnotes i Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 at 642-3. ii Chappel v Hart [1998] HCA 55; 195 CLR 232; 156 ALR 517; 72 ALJR 1344 (2 September iii Re Henjo Investments Pty Limited; Henry Saade and Saade Developments Pty Limited v......
-
Vioxx appeal in Full Federal Court successful
...steps away from this interpretation. Footnotes 1 Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd v Peterson [2011] FCAFC 128 at 93. 2 (1998) 195 CLR 232. 3 (1998) 195 CLR 232 at [27]. 4Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd v Peterson [2011] FCAFC 128 at 104-105. 5Merck Sharp & Dohme (......
9 books & journal articles
-
THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL INTERESTS
...stance, Singapore's position with respect to the non-disclosure of medical risks is currently somewhat isolated (see para 16 below). 37 (1998) 195 CLR 232. 38 [2005] 1 AC 134. 39 Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232 and Chester v Afshar[2005] 1 AC 134 were decided in the wake of the seminal in......
-
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE AND PATIENT AUTONOMY
...AC 134. 34 For a recent critique of this case, see Tamsyn Clark & Donal Nolan, “A Critique of Chester v Afshar”(2014) 34 OxJLS 659. 35 (1998) 195 CLR 232. 36 Chester v Afshar [2005] 1 AC 134 at [14] and [18]. 37 See, for example, Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust[2004] 1 AC 309 ......
-
Autonomy and the Law of the Faster Horse: In Response to the Adoption of Autonomous Vehicles, What Aspects of the Australian and Irish Legal Liability Frameworks Require Reform?
...Manufacturers will need to be wary of making bold claims about the revolutionary 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232; Rosenberg v Percival (2001) 205 CLR Geistfeld (n 58) 1621. Worsley v Tambrands Ltd [1999] EWHC 273. European Parliament and Council Directive 2......
-
Le juge canadien, anglais et australien devant l'incertitude causale en matiere de responsabilite medicale.
...l'etude des importantes affaires anglaise (Chester v Afshar, [2004] UKHL 41, [2005] 1 AC 134) et australienne (Chappel v Hart, [1998] HCA 55, [1998] 195 CLR 232) qui traitent de la causalite dans le contexte du consentement eclaire est exclue. (2) Voir par ex Snell c Farrell, [1990] 2 RCS 3......
Request a trial to view additional results