Chapter 6 Terrorism and violent internal conflict in post-soeharto Indonesia: Beyond the Jihadi prism of analysis

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/S1572-8323(2010)0000014010
Date08 July 2010
Published date08 July 2010
Pages89-105
AuthorLeanne Piggott
CHAPTER 6
TERRORISM AND VIOLENT
INTERNAL CONFLICT IN
POST-SOEHARTO INDONESIA:
BEYOND THE JIHADI PRISM
OF ANALYSIS
Leanne Piggott
ABSTRACT
Purpose – Since September 2001, most studies of terrorism have focused
on the motives and operations of transnational terrorist groups, especially
Islamist jihadi groups. Yet statistics from the past decade indicate that
most terrorist attacks occurred within violent internal conf‌licts. Indonesia
is a case in point. Following the fall of the Soeharto regime in 1998,
terrorism became a hallmark of separatist and inter-communal violence
that cost the lives of thousands of Indonesians. The aim of this chapter is
to look beyond the jihadi-focused prism of terrorism studies and to
examine the secessionist conf‌licts in Aceh and Papua to determine why
and to what extent terrorism was used by the Free Aceh Movement
(GAM) and the Free Papua Movement (OPM) respectively, and the
role that economic factors played in the process.
Economics of War and Peace: Economic, Legal, and Political Perspectives
Contributions to Conf‌lict Management, Peace Economics and Development, Volume 14, 89–105
Copyright r2010 by Emerald Group Publishing Limited
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved
ISSN: 1572-8323/doi:10.1108/S1572-8323(2010)0000014010
89
Methodology – By synthesising the causes of violent internal conf‌licts
and of terrorism, a framework of societal and organisational factors is
constructed to explain why terrorism was used by GAM and OPM, and
why, in the case of GAM it stopped,while in the case of OPM, it continues.
Findings – In general, socio-economic and political factors rather than
religious ideology explain why terrorism was used by GAM and continues
to be used by OPM in their respective secessionist conf‌licts. Economic
grievances fuelled by resource exploitation and inequitable sharing of
resource rents have been contributing factors.
Originality/value of chapter – The analysis departs from previous
approaches, which have focused primarily on the causes and course of the
conf‌licts themselves and not on when and why such conf‌licts have included
terrorist attacks.
INTRODUCTION
The vast literature on terrorism that followed al-Qaeda’s attacks on New
York and Washington on 11 September 2001 provides numerous explana-
tions of what terrorism is, why terrorists choose such a violent modus
operandi, and what they seek. Most works, which are written by Western
scholars, focus on the motives and operations of transnational groups
1
which are responsible for attacks on democratic states, especially Islamist
jihadi groups,
2
and in particular al-Qaeda. Others have examined
asymmetrical conf‌licts in which transnational jihadi terrorist groups are
pitted against local and/or international military forces, as in Iraq and
Afghanistan. Accordingly, the role of religious ideology within transna-
tional groups is highlighted as a ‘root cause’ of contemporary terrorism. Yet
statistics on terrorist attacks over the past decade indicate that most
occurred in the context of violent internal conf‌licts in which domestic actors
were prevalent, operating outside the framework of transnational groups.
Indeed, the available data indicates that domestic incidents of terrorism
are substantially higher in number than international incidents, with
correspondingly higher f‌igures for injuries and deaths (Stepanova, 2008;
Derin-Gu
¨re, 2009). Further, in cases that involve secessionist groups, socio-
economic and political factors rather than religious ideology provide a more
comprehensive understanding of why terrorism occurs.
Indonesia is a case in point. In the wake of the economic crisis that
preceded the fall of the Soeharto regime in 1998 and the political instability
that followed, long-standing separatist conf‌licts in Aceh, East Timor and
LEANNE PIGGOTT90

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex