Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties v Buckle

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1998] HCA 4,1998-0123 HCA A
Date1998
Year1998
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
150 cases
1 firm's commentaries
4 books & journal articles
  • THE CASE AGAINST THE EQUITABLE LIEN.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 3, April 2019
    • 1 Abril 2019
    ...144 CLR 360, 367 (Stephen, Mason, Aickin and Wilson JJ) ('Octavo Investments'); Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v Buckle (1998) 192 CLR 226, 245-7 [46]-[51] (Brennan CJ, Toohey, Gaudron, McHugh and Gummow JJ); Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Australia Pty Ltd v Commonwealth [2019] ......
  • CARTER HOLT HARVEY WOODPRODUCTS AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD. V. COMMONWEALTH: THE TRUE NATURE OF THE TRUSTEE'S RIGHT OF INDEMNITY.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 43 No. 3, April 2020
    • 1 Abril 2020
    ...of Stamp Duties [1984] 1 Qd R 576, 587 (McPherson J) ('Kemtron'). See also Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v Buckle (1998) 192 CLR 226, 246 [48] (Brennan CJ, Toohey, Gaudron, McHugh and Gummow JJ) (15) See, eg, Jones v Matrix Partners Pty Ltd; Re Killarnee Civil & Concrete Cont......
  • THE INTERSECTION OF COMPANIES AND TRUSTS.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 43 No. 3, April 2020
    • 1 Abril 2020
    ...of one insolvent trustee be treated? (106) See Re AAA Financial Intelligence Ltd (in liq) [2014] NSWSC 1004, [13] (Brereton J). (107) (1998) 192 CLR 226 ('Buckle'). (108) (2005) 224 CLR 98 ('CPT Custodian). (109) (2009) 239 CLR 346 ('Bruton Holdings'). (110) Buckle (n 107) 247 [51] (Brennan......
  • The Evolution of the Modern International Trust: Developments and Challenges
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 103-5, July 2018
    • 1 Julio 2018
    ...note 43, at 154, 158; Matthew Conaglen, The Nature and Function of Fiduciary Loyalty , 121 L.Q. Rev. 452Chief Comm’r of Stamp Duties (NSW) v. Buckle, [1998] HCA 4, 192 CLR 226 (Austl.) and Clayton v. Clayton, [2016] NZSC 29 (N.Z.)). 5 . See infra Part III. 6. Ho’s company is Macau’s largest......