Chief Executive Officer of Customs v El Hajje
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | McHugh,Gummow,Hayne,Heydon JJ,Kirby J |
| Judgment Date | 03 August 2005 |
| Neutral Citation | 2005-0803 HCA A,[2005] HCA 35 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 03 August 2005 |
| Docket Number | M171/2004 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
- Ackers (as Joint Foreign Representative) v Saad Investments Company Ltd (in Official Liquidation) (A Company Registered in the Cayman Islands)
-
Combet v Commonwealth
...2nd ed (1910) at 152. 210 (1990) 169 CLR 195 at 212. 211 (1975) 134 CLR 338. 212Chief Executive Officer of Customs v El Hajje (2005) 79 ALJR 1289 at 1304 [74]–[75] and cases there cited; 218 ALR 457 at 213 cf APLA Ltd v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) (2005) 219 ALR 403 at 429–431 [92]–[9......
-
Apla Ltd v Legal Services Commissioner (Nsw)
...Manufacturing Co (Australasia) Ltd v New South Wales (1927) 40 CLR 333 at 347. See also Chief Executive Officer of Customs v El Hajje [2005] HCA 35 at [27]–[28] per McHugh, Gummow, Hayne and Heydon JJ, [59]–[60] of my own reasons. The practice of the Court and individual views about the rel......
-
Stevens v Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment
...79 ALJR 1121 at 1141 [112] fn 147 and cases there cited; 215 ALR 253 at 279. See also Chief Executive Officer of Customs v El Hajje (2005) 79 ALJR 1289 at 1304 [74]; 218 ALR 457 at 477; R v Lavender (2005) 79 ALJR 1337 at 1354–1355 [93]–[95]; 218 ALR 521 at 176 As well, prosecutions under t......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
From Foreign Circumstances to First Instance Considerations: Extrinsic Material and the Law of Statutory Interpretation
...inherent in interpreting written words, see: Frankfurter, above n 3, 528– 29. 12 Chief Executive Officer of Customs v El Hajje (2005) 218 ALR 457, 477. 13 In a recent case which turned on a question of statutory interpretation, Kirby J (in dissent) specifically noted the, 'basic nature of t......