Church of Scientology Inc. v Woodward

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1982-1119 HCA A,1980-1002 HCA A,[1982] HCA 78
Year1980
Date1980
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
63 cases
  • Parkin v O'sullivan
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Michael Noel James Hosking and Marie Angela Hosking v Simon Runting and
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 25 March 2004
    ...their privacy. There were some early indications that a privacy tort might be introduced, and in Church of Scientology v Woodward (1982) 154 CLR 25, 68 Murphy J identified “unjustified invasion of privacy” as a developing tort. However, later courts have declined to recognise a stand-alone ......
  • Aaron Joe Thomas Graham(Plaintiff) v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 6 September 2017
    ...201–203 [52]–[55], 272–274 [232]–[238]. 12 (2008) 234 CLR 532 at 556 [24]; [2008] HCA 4, quoting Church of Scientology v Woodward (1982) 154 CLR 25 at 61; [1982] HCA 78. 13Thomas v Mowbray (2007) 233 CLR 307 at 355 [111]; [2007] HCA 33. 14 (1978) 142 CLR 1; [1978] HCA 43. 15 (1978) 142 CLR ......
  • MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and Another
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 19 May 2021
    ...“The Constitutional Dimension”, in Groves (ed), Modern Administrative Law in Australia: Concepts and Context (2014) 165 at 175. 93 (1982) 154 CLR 25 at 70. See also Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Abebe [No 1] (1998) 72 ALJR 574 at 577 [18]; 151 ALR 711 at 71......
  • Get Started for Free
12 books & journal articles
  • Judicial review of migration decisions: ousting the Hickman private clause?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 3, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...Campbell, above n 28, 152. (141) Ibid 152-3; Administrative Review Council, above n 129. (142) Church of Scientology Inc v Woodward (1982) 154 CLR 25, 70 (Brennan J), describing judicial review as the `means by which executive action is prevented from exceeding the powers and functions assi......
  • Federal Constitutional Influences on State Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...is a defining feature of the courts in a constitutional sense. 68 Finn, above n 5, 107. 69 See, eg, Church of Scien tology v Woodward (1982) 154 CLR 25, 70 where Brennan J stated that 'judicial review is neither more nor less than the enforcement of the rule of law over executive action; it......
  • Judicial Review of Non-Statutory Executive Powers
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-3, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...courts'.108 _____________________________________________________________________________________ 106 Church of Scientology v Woodward (1983) 154 CLR 25, 70 (Brennan J); Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 195 ALR 24, 34 [31] (Gleeson CJ); see also Attorney-General v Quin (1990) 170 C......
  • The Legal Personality of the Commonwealth of Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 47-1, March 2019
    • 1 March 2019
    ...Acquisition Committee Case (1947) 74 CLR 375, 384–6 (Latham CJ), 390(Starke J), 396–7 (Williams J); Church of Scientology v Woodward (1982) 154 CLR 25, 56 (Mason J).Hartford Davis 23. Queensland Rail (2015) 256 CLR 171, 188 [38], 189 [40] (French CJ, Hayne, Kiefel, Bell, Keane andNettle JJ)......
  • Get Started for Free