Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 7)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date05 September 2008
Neutral Citation[2008] FCA 1364
CourtFederal Court

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 7) [2008] FCA 1364



TRADE PRACTICES – misleading or deceptive conduct pursuant to sections 52 and 53A Trade Practice Act 1974 (Cth) (the Act) – sale of citrus orchards – multiple alleged representations – written and oral representations – whether falsity of representations established on evidence – whether materiality in inaccuracy of trading figures a relevant consideration – silence as misleading or deceptive conduct – possibility of employee resigning – non-disclosure of management records – non-disclosure of internal working documents – whether obligation to disclose


TRADE PRACTICES – representations with respect to future matters pursuant to section 51A of the Act – reversal of onus of proof – whether representations made – whether reasonable grounds for making representations – nature of budgetary forecasts – relevance of past performance to reasonableness of future representations


TRADE PRACTICES – accessorial liability pursuant to section 75B of the Act – test established in Yorke v Lucas – knowledge of the essential elements of contravention – adequacy of pleadings


TRADE PRACTICES – whether applicants suffered loss or damage by conduct of respondents pursuant to section 82 of the Act


TRADE PRACTICES – authority to bind body corporate pursuant to section 84 of the Act – whether third respondent’s conduct within scope of actual or apparent authority


EVIDENCE – expert agronomist – admissibility of expert opinion evidence – whether practice direction breached – reliance on unidentified third party data – existence of basis rule pursuant to section 79 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – whether expert opinion hearsay – relevance of opinion evidence pursuant to sections 55 and 56 Evidence Act – failure of expert to visit property – discretion to exclude evidence pursuant to section 135 Evidence Act – weight attributed to expert opinion based on unidentified sources


EVIDENCE – assessment of witness credibility – weight of evidence given to witness – findings of fact influenced by credit – competing evidence by key witnesses – failure to call witnesses – whether negative inference drawn


EVIDENCE – unsigned statement – weight attributed to unsigned statement – witness not called


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – clarity of pleadings – whether pleadings have sufficient clarity for respondents to meet case


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interest on damages – correct rate of interest owing pursuant to section 51A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)


Held: application dismissed – cross-claim allowed – no accessorial liability in second or third respondents



Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Pt 5.3A

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 55, 56, 79, 135

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 51A

Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 4, 51A, 52, 53A, 75B, 80, 82, 84, 87

Supreme Court Act (Qld) s 47



Accounting Systems 2000 (Developments) Pty Ltd v CCH Australia Ltd (1993) 42 FCR 470 cited

Adelaide Petroleum NL & Ors v Poseidon Limited & Ors (1988) 10 ATPR 40-901 cited

Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S [2008] FCA 559 cited

Amadio Pty Ltd v Henderson (1998) 81 FCR 149 cited

Arnotts Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1990) 24 FCR 313 cited

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2007] 244 ALR 470 cited

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Top Snack Foods Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 752 cited

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Universal Sports Challenge Ltd [2002] FCA 1276 cited

Australian Security and Investments Commission v Rich (2005) 218 ALR 764 considered

Australian Retail Enterprises Pty Ltd v ND Cowan Nominees Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 538 cited

Banque Commerciale SA (in liq) v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279 considered

Bodney v Bennell [2008] FCAFC 63 cited

Bowler v Hilda Pty Ltd (1998) 153 ALR 95 cited

Brick and Pipe Industries Ltd v Occidental Life Nominees Pty Ltd (1990) 3 ACSR 649 cited

Brown v Jam Factory Pty Ltd (1981) 53 FLR 340 cited

Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592 cited

Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 364 cited

CE Heath Underwriting and Insurance (Australia) Pty Ltd v Daraway Constructions Pty Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, 3 August 1995) cited

Centurion Roller Shutters Pty Ltd v Automatic Technology (Australia) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1118 cited

Christofidellis v Zdrilic [1999] FCA 39 cited

City of Botany Council v Jazabas Pty Limited [2001] NSWCA 94 cited

Como Investments Pty Ltd (in liq) v Yenald Nominees Pty Ltd (1997) 19 ATPR 41–550 cited

Crocker v Papunya Tula Artists Pty Ltd (1985) 61 ALR 529 cited

Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 cited

Elitegold Pty Limited v CM Holdings Pty Ltd, Australia Fair Shopping Centres Pty Limited and CM Developments (Qld) Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 1336 cited

Elliot v Ivey [1998] NSWSC 116 considered

English Exporters (London) Ltd v Eldonwall Ltd (1973) 1 Ch 415 cited

Equity Access Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1990) ATPR 40-994 cited

Evans Deakin Pty Ltd v Sebel Furniture Ltd [2003] FCA 171 cited

Famel Pty Ltd v Burswood Management Ltd (1989) ATPR 40-962 cited

Fleetman Pty Ltd v Cairns Pty Ltd [2005] FCAFC 80 cited

Fraser v NRMA Holdings Ltd (1995) 55 FCR 452 cited

Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Magnal) Ltd [1946] 2 QB 480 cited

GEC Marconi Systems Pty Ltd v BHP Information Technology Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 688 cited

Given v Pryor (1979) 24 ALR 442 cited

Global Sportsman Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Pty Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 82 cited

Gordon v Commonwealth [2008] FCA 603 cited

Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215) cited

Henjo Investments Pty Ltd v Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd (No 1) (1988) 39 FCR 546 cited

Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459 cited

HG v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 414 cited

Hill v Tooth & Co Ltd (1998) ATPR 41-649 considered

Hornsby Building Information Centre Pty Ltd v Sydney Building Information Centre Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 216 cited

Ingot Capital Investments Pty Ltd v Macquarie Equity Capital Markets Ltd (No 6) (2007) 63 ACLR 1 cited

Incorporated v Minister Administering the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) (1994) 51 FCR 243 cited

John G Glass Real Estate Pty Ltd v Karawi Constructions Pty Ltd (1993) ATPR 41-249 cited

Johnson v Eastern Micro Electronics Pty Ltd (1986) 70 ALR 339 cited

Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 cited

Lahoud v Lahoud [2006] NSWCA 169 cited

Lake Koala Pty Ltd v Walker [1991] 2 Qd R 49 cited

Lam v Ausintel Investments Australia Pty Ltd (1990) 97 FLR 458 cited

Lewarne v Momentum Productions Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1136 cited

Lezam Pty Ltd v Seabridge Australia Pty Ltd (1992) 35 FCR 535 cited

Lubidineuse v Bevanere Pty Ltd (1984) 55 ALR 273 distinguished

Lyndel Nominees Pty Ltd v Mobil Oil Australia Ltd (1997) 37 IPR 599 cited

McGrath; in the matter of Pan Pharmaceuticals Ltd (in liq) v Australian Naturalcare Products Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 2 cited

McMahon v Pomeray Pty Ltd [1991] FCA 289 cited

McWilliam’s Wines Pty Ltd v McDonald’s System of Australia (1980) 33 ALR 394 cited

MGICA (1992) Ltd v Kenny & Good Pty Ltd (1996) 140 ALR 313 at 358 cited

Mount Lawley Pty Ltd v Western Australian Planning Commission [2006] WASC 82 cited

National Australia Bank Ltd v Cunningham [1990] FCA 310 cited

Neowarra v Western Australia (2003) 134 FCR 208 cited

Notaras v Hugh [2003] NSWSC 167 cited

Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191 cited

Phoenix Court Pty Ltd v Melbourne Central Pty Ltd (1997)ATPR 46-179 at 54,432 considered

Quick v Stoland Pty Ltd (1998) 87 FCR 371 cited

Quinlivan v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2004] FCAFC 175 applied

Ramsay v Watson [1961] 108 CLR 642 considered

Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie SA v UIM Chemical Services Pty Ltd (1986) 12 FCR 477 cited

Ricochet Pty Ltd v Equity Trustees Executors and Agency Company Ltd (1993) 41 FCR 229 cited

Rumpe v Camrol Pty Ltd [1985] FCA 5 cited

Scootmore Holdings Pty Ltd v Bidvest Australia Limited [2001] QSC 329 cited

Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd v Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd [2002] FCAFC 157 cited

Sykes v Reserve Bank of Australia (1998) 88 FCR 511 cited

Taco Co of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 cited

The Australian William E Simon Graduate School of Business Administration Incorporated v Minister Administering the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) (1994) 51 FCR 243 cited

The Minister v Ryan (1963) 9 LGRA 112 cited

Ting v Blanche (1993) 118 ALR 543 cited

Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 applied

Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 applied

Wenczel v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2006] VSC 324 cited

Wheeler Grace & Pierucci Pty Ltd v Wright (1989) 16 IPR 189 cited

Winterton Constructions Pty Ltd v Hambros Australia Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 97 considered

Yang v American International Assurance Co (Australia) Ltd [2008] FCA 39 cited

Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 applied



Australian Law Reform Commission’s Interim Report on Evidence (ALRC No 26, 1985).

Halsbury’s Law of England (4th ed, Butterworths) Vol 31

Heydon JD, Cross on Evidence (Australian Edition, Butterworths, subscription service)

Vol 1

Freckelton I and Selby H, Expert Evidence (3rd ed, Lawbook Co, 2005)

Lockhart C, The Law of Misleading or Deceptive Conduct (2nd ed, LexisNexis Butterworths, Australia 2003)

Miller, Miller’s Annotated Trade Practices Act (29th ed, Thomson, 2008)

Odgers S, Uniform Evidence Law (7th ed, Lawbook Co, 2006)

Ricketson S, The Law of Intellectual Property: Copyright, Designs & Confidential Information (2nd ed, Lawbook Co subscription service, 2002)



CITRUS QUEENSLAND PTY LTD (ACN 110 885 359), PETER MICHAEL TRACY and SUNSTATE CITRUS PTY LTD (ACN 112 847 560) (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) v SUNSTATE ORCHARDS PTY LTD (ACN 095 659 733), ANDREW COLIN STRAHLEY and DAVID BREED

QUD 400 OF 2005

COLLIER J

5 SEPTEMBER 2008

BRISBANE




IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Readymix Holdings International Pte Ltd v Wieland Process Equipment Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 3 October 2008
    ...v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 95, 66 ACSR 359 considered Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 7) [2008] FCA 1364 followed Codelfa Construction Pty Limited v State Rail Authority of NSW (1981) 149 CLR 337 considered Como Investments Pty Ltd v Yenald Nomin......
  • Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Woolworths Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 July 2019
    ...Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Limited [2000] HCA 12; 202 CLR 45 Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 7) [2008] FCA 1364 City of Botany Bay Council v Jazabas Pty Limited (ACN 060 105 053) [2001] NSWCA 94; ATPR 46-210 Cummings v Lewis [1993] FCA 190; 41 FCR 559 ......