Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 7)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 05 September 2008 |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] FCA 1364 |
| Court | Federal Court |
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 7) [2008] FCA 1364
TRADE PRACTICES – representations with respect to future matters pursuant to section 51A of the Act – reversal of onus of proof – whether representations made – whether reasonable grounds for making representations – nature of budgetary forecasts – relevance of past performance to reasonableness of future representations
TRADE PRACTICES – accessorial liability pursuant to section 75B of the Act – test established in Yorke v Lucas – knowledge of the essential elements of contravention – adequacy of pleadings
TRADE PRACTICES – whether applicants suffered loss or damage by conduct of respondents pursuant to section 82 of the Act
TRADE PRACTICES – authority to bind body corporate pursuant to section 84 of the Act – whether third respondent’s conduct within scope of actual or apparent authority
EVIDENCE – expert agronomist – admissibility of expert opinion evidence – whether practice direction breached – reliance on unidentified third party data – existence of basis rule pursuant to section 79 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – whether expert opinion hearsay – relevance of opinion evidence pursuant to sections 55 and 56 Evidence Act – failure of expert to visit property – discretion to exclude evidence pursuant to section 135 Evidence Act – weight attributed to expert opinion based on unidentified sources
EVIDENCE – assessment of witness credibility – weight of evidence given to witness – findings of fact influenced by credit – competing evidence by key witnesses – failure to call witnesses – whether negative inference drawn
EVIDENCE – unsigned statement – weight attributed to unsigned statement – witness not called
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – clarity of pleadings – whether pleadings have sufficient clarity for respondents to meet case
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interest on damages – correct rate of interest owing pursuant to section 51A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Pt 5.3A
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 55, 56, 79, 135
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 51A
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 4, 51A, 52, 53A, 75B, 80, 82, 84, 87
Supreme Court Act (Qld) s 47
Accounting Systems 2000 (Developments) Pty Ltd v CCH Australia Ltd (1993) 42 FCR 470 cited
Adelaide Petroleum NL & Ors v Poseidon Limited & Ors (1988) 10 ATPR 40-901 cited
Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S [2008] FCA 559 cited
Amadio Pty Ltd v Henderson (1998) 81 FCR 149 cited
Arnotts Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1990) 24 FCR 313 cited
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2007] 244 ALR 470 cited
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Top Snack Foods Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 752 cited
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Universal Sports Challenge Ltd [2002] FCA 1276 cited
Australian Security and Investments Commission v Rich (2005) 218 ALR 764 considered
Australian Retail Enterprises Pty Ltd v ND Cowan Nominees Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 538 cited
Banque Commerciale SA (in liq) v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279 considered
Bodney v Bennell [2008] FCAFC 63 cited
Bowler v Hilda Pty Ltd (1998) 153 ALR 95 cited
Brick and Pipe Industries Ltd v Occidental Life Nominees Pty Ltd (1990) 3 ACSR 649 cited
Brown v Jam Factory Pty Ltd (1981) 53 FLR 340 cited
Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592 cited
Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 364 cited
CE Heath Underwriting and Insurance (Australia) Pty Ltd v Daraway Constructions Pty Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, 3 August 1995) cited
Centurion Roller Shutters Pty Ltd v Automatic Technology (Australia) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1118 cited
Christofidellis v Zdrilic [1999] FCA 39 cited
City of Botany Council v Jazabas Pty Limited [2001] NSWCA 94 cited
Como Investments Pty Ltd (in liq) v Yenald Nominees Pty Ltd (1997) 19 ATPR 41–550 cited
Crocker v Papunya Tula Artists Pty Ltd (1985) 61 ALR 529 cited
Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 cited
Elitegold Pty Limited v CM Holdings Pty Ltd, Australia Fair Shopping Centres Pty Limited and CM Developments (Qld) Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 1336 cited
Elliot v Ivey [1998] NSWSC 116 considered
English Exporters (London) Ltd v Eldonwall Ltd (1973) 1 Ch 415 cited
Equity Access Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1990) ATPR 40-994 cited
Evans Deakin Pty Ltd v Sebel Furniture Ltd [2003] FCA 171 cited
Famel Pty Ltd v Burswood Management Ltd (1989) ATPR 40-962 cited
Fleetman Pty Ltd v Cairns Pty Ltd [2005] FCAFC 80 cited
Fraser v NRMA Holdings Ltd (1995) 55 FCR 452 cited
Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Magnal) Ltd [1946] 2 QB 480 cited
GEC Marconi Systems Pty Ltd v BHP Information Technology Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 688 cited
Given v Pryor (1979) 24 ALR 442 cited
Global Sportsman Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Pty Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 82 cited
Gordon v Commonwealth [2008] FCA 603 cited
Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215) cited
Henjo Investments Pty Ltd v Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd (No 1) (1988) 39 FCR 546 cited
Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459 cited
HG v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 414 cited
Hill v Tooth & Co Ltd (1998) ATPR 41-649 considered
Hornsby Building Information Centre Pty Ltd v Sydney Building Information Centre Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 216 cited
Ingot Capital Investments Pty Ltd v Macquarie Equity Capital Markets Ltd (No 6) (2007) 63 ACLR 1 cited
Incorporated v Minister Administering the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) (1994) 51 FCR 243 cited
John G Glass Real Estate Pty Ltd v Karawi Constructions Pty Ltd (1993) ATPR 41-249 cited
Johnson v Eastern Micro Electronics Pty Ltd (1986) 70 ALR 339 cited
Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 cited
Lahoud v Lahoud [2006] NSWCA 169 cited
Lake Koala Pty Ltd v Walker [1991] 2 Qd R 49 cited
Lam v Ausintel Investments Australia Pty Ltd (1990) 97 FLR 458 cited
Lewarne v Momentum Productions Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1136 cited
Lezam Pty Ltd v Seabridge Australia Pty Ltd (1992) 35 FCR 535 cited
Lubidineuse v Bevanere Pty Ltd (1984) 55 ALR 273 distinguished
Lyndel Nominees Pty Ltd v Mobil Oil Australia Ltd (1997) 37 IPR 599 cited
McGrath; in the matter of Pan Pharmaceuticals Ltd (in liq) v Australian Naturalcare Products Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 2 cited
McMahon v Pomeray Pty Ltd [1991] FCA 289 cited
McWilliam’s Wines Pty Ltd v McDonald’s System of Australia (1980) 33 ALR 394 cited
MGICA (1992) Ltd v Kenny & Good Pty Ltd (1996) 140 ALR 313 at 358 cited
Mount Lawley Pty Ltd v Western Australian Planning Commission [2006] WASC 82 cited
National Australia Bank Ltd v Cunningham [1990] FCA 310 cited
Neowarra v Western Australia (2003) 134 FCR 208 cited
Notaras v Hugh [2003] NSWSC 167 cited
Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191 cited
Phoenix Court Pty Ltd v Melbourne Central Pty Ltd (1997)ATPR 46-179 at 54,432 considered
Quick v Stoland Pty Ltd (1998) 87 FCR 371 cited
Quinlivan v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2004] FCAFC 175 applied
Ramsay v Watson [1961] 108 CLR 642 considered
Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie SA v UIM Chemical Services Pty Ltd (1986) 12 FCR 477 cited
Ricochet Pty Ltd v Equity Trustees Executors and Agency Company Ltd (1993) 41 FCR 229 cited
Rumpe v Camrol Pty Ltd [1985] FCA 5 cited
Scootmore Holdings Pty Ltd v Bidvest Australia Limited [2001] QSC 329 cited
Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd v Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd [2002] FCAFC 157 cited
Sykes v Reserve Bank of Australia (1998) 88 FCR 511 cited
Taco Co of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 cited
The Australian William E Simon Graduate School of Business Administration Incorporated v Minister Administering the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) (1994) 51 FCR 243 cited
The Minister v Ryan (1963) 9 LGRA 112 cited
Ting v Blanche (1993) 118 ALR 543 cited
Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 applied
Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 applied
Wenczel v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2006] VSC 324 cited
Wheeler Grace & Pierucci Pty Ltd v Wright (1989) 16 IPR 189 cited
Winterton Constructions Pty Ltd v Hambros Australia Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 97 considered
Yang v American International Assurance Co (Australia) Ltd [2008] FCA 39 cited
Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 applied
Australian Law Reform Commission’s Interim Report on Evidence (ALRC No 26, 1985).
Halsbury’s Law of England (4th ed, Butterworths) Vol 31
Heydon JD, Cross on Evidence (Australian Edition, Butterworths, subscription service)
Vol 1
Freckelton I and Selby H, Expert Evidence (3rd ed, Lawbook Co, 2005)
Lockhart C, The Law of Misleading or Deceptive Conduct (2nd ed, LexisNexis Butterworths, Australia 2003)
Miller, Miller’s Annotated Trade Practices Act (29th ed, Thomson, 2008)
Odgers S, Uniform Evidence Law (7th ed, Lawbook Co, 2006)
Ricketson S, The Law of Intellectual Property: Copyright, Designs & Confidential Information (2nd ed, Lawbook Co subscription service, 2002)
QUD 400 OF 2005
COLLIER J
5 SEPTEMBER 2008
BRISBANE
| IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
|
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Readymix Holdings International Pte Ltd v Wieland Process Equipment Pty Ltd (No 2)
...v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 95, 66 ACSR 359 considered Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 7) [2008] FCA 1364 followed Codelfa Construction Pty Limited v State Rail Authority of NSW (1981) 149 CLR 337 considered Como Investments Pty Ltd v Yenald Nomin......
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Woolworths Limited
...Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Limited [2000] HCA 12; 202 CLR 45 Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 7) [2008] FCA 1364 City of Botany Bay Council v Jazabas Pty Limited (ACN 060 105 053) [2001] NSWCA 94; ATPR 46-210 Cummings v Lewis [1993] FCA 190; 41 FCR 559 ......