Clive Frederick Palmer(Plaintiff) v Marcus William Ayres, Stephen James Parbery and Michael Andrew Owen in their Capacities as Liquidators of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) and Others
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Kiefel,Keane,Nettle,Gordon JJ.,Gageler J. |
| Judgment Date | 08 February 2017 |
| Neutral Citation | [2017] HCA 5 |
| Docket Number | B52/2016 & B55/2016 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 08 February 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 cases
- JRI Resources Sdn Bhd v Kuwait Finance House (M) Bhd (President of Association of Islamic Banking Institutions Malaysia and Another, interveners)
-
Clarence City Council v Commonwealth of Australia
...and encompassing all claims made within the scope of the controversy”: Fencott at 603, cited in CGU at [30]; see also Palmer v Ayres [2017] HCA 5; 259 CLR 478 (Palmer) at [24] per Kiefel CJ, Keane, Nettle and Gordon JJ. There must accordingly be a “controversy”, which must be “real and imme......
-
Burns v Corbett; Burns v Gaynor; Attorney General for New South Wales v Burns; Attorney General for New South Wales v Burns; New South Wales v Burns
...Communist Party v The Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1 at 193; [1951] HCA 5. See also Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478 at 495–496 [42]; [2017] HCA 5. 124Cole v Whitfield (1988) 165 CLR 360 at 385; [1988] HCA 125Burns v Corbett (2017) 343 ALR 690 at 705 [59]. 126 See generally Lang, Crown Land ......
-
National Australia Bank Limited v Nautilus Insurance Pte Ltd (No 2)
...32; 145 CLR 457 Neeta (Epping) Pty Ltd v Phillips [1974] HCA 18; 131 CLR 286 NRMA Insurance Ltd v Tatt (1989) 94 FLR 339 Palmer v Ayres [2017] HCA 5; 259 CLR 478 Philip Morris Inc v Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 7; 148 CLR 457 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [19......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Nobody Expects The Inquisition: High Court Of Australia Opens The Door To Extraordinary Public Examination Powers To Potential Class Action Plaintiffs And Beyond
...Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 5.3(1). However, ASIC may require this in designating eligible applicant status. 7. Palmer v Ayres [2017] HCA 5 at [40] (Kiefel, Keane, Nettle and Gordon 8. Typically, by the examinee saying the word 'privilege' before every answer. 9. In re Greys Brewery......