CLK Kitchens & Joinery Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeDERRINGTON J
Judgment Date12 July 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCA 1086
CourtFederal Court
Date12 July 2019


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


CLK Kitchens & Joinery Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 1086


File numbers:


QUD 369 of 2017QUD 241 of 2018



Judge:

DERRINGTON J



Date of judgment:

12 July 2019



Catchwords:

TAXATION – PAYG liability – whether estimates by Commissioner of PAYG amounts valid – whether PAYG withholder gave a statutory declaration which had the effect of reducing or revoking estimate – whether DPNs issued on basis of PAYG estimates valid – whether reduction in estimate required withdrawal of DPNs


PRACTICE – summary judgment in complex cases – where substantial material and numerous jurisdictional errors alleged – where Court asked to assess large amounts of evidence – where evaluation discloses no real prospect of success by applicant – where most evidence irrelevant



Legislation:

Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth)

Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)

Statutory Declarations Act 1959 (Cth)

Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), Sch 1, s 12-35, s 16-70, Div 268, Div 269

Tax Laws Amendment (Transfer of Provisions) Act 2010 (Cth)

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)



Cases cited:

Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321

Bank of New South Wales v Murphett [1983] 1 VR 489

Barclays Bank Ltd v W J Simms Son & Cooke (Southern) Ltd [1980] QB 677

Bernstrom v National Australia Bank Ltd [2003] 1 Qd R 469

Bibby Financial Services Australia Pty Ltd v Sharma [2014] NSWCA 37

Brinsmead v Harrison (1871) LR 7 CP 547

Cassaniti v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2010) 186 FCR 480

Commercial Bank of Australia v Younis [1979] 1 NSWLR 444

Commissioner of Taxation v Craddock (2006) 204 FLR 274

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v ZYX Learning Centres Ltd (2014) 103 ACSR 476

Commonwealth of Australia v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Applied Design Development Pty Ltd (in liq) (2002) 117 FCR 336

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Armstrong Scalisi Holdings Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 129

Filgate v Thompson (1874) 5 AJR 124

Foodco Management Pty Ltd v Go My Travel Pty Ltd [2002] 2 Qd R 249

Guss v Commissioner of Taxation (2006) 152 FCR 88

Jessup v Lawyers Private Mortgages Ltd [2006] QSC 3

K J Davies (1976) Ltd v Bank of New South Wales [1981] 1 NZLR 262

Perdikaris v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2008) 172 FCR 412

Price v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 543

Queensland University of Technology v Project Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd (in liq) [2003] 1 Qd R 259

Re Plutus Payroll Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1360

Roche v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2014) 290 FLR 268

Sargent v ASL Developments Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 634

Seventeenth Canute Pty Ltd v Bradley Air-Conditioning Pty Ltd [1987] 1 Qd R 111

SK Foods LP v SK Foods Australia Pty Limited (in liq) (No 3) (2013) 214 FCR 543

Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 241 CLR 118

Theseus Exploration NL v Foyster (1972) 126 CLR 507

Transtar Linehaul Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2011) 196 FCR 271

Zippo Manufacturing Co v Jaxlawn Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1125

Zippo Manufacturing Co v Jaxlawn Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1125



Date of hearing:

13 December 2018



Registry:

Queensland



Division:

General Division



National Practice Area:

Taxation



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

268



Counsel for the Applicants:

Mr D Marks QC with Mr C Craig



Solicitor for the Applicants:

Morgan Conley



Counsel for the Respondent:

Dr R Schulte



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Australian Taxation Office



ORDERS


QUD 241 of 2018

BETWEEN:

CLK KITCHENS & JOINERY PTY LTD ACN 110 815 828

First Applicant


CLINT LUCKY KARANANOS

Second Applicant


AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

Respondent



QUD 369 of 2017

BETWEEN:

ACN 110 815 828 PTY LTD

First Applicant


CLINT LUCKY KARANANOS

Second Applicant


AND:

COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

Respondent



JUDGE:

DERRINGTON J

DATE OF ORDER:

12 JULY 2019



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


1. In proceeding QUD 369 of 2017:

(a) the proceeding is dismissed;

(b) the applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the proceeding.

2. In proceeding QUD 241 of 2018:

(a) the proceeding is dismissed;

(b) the applicants pay the respondent’s costs of the proceeding.



Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.



REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

DERRINGTON J:

INTRODUCTION

1 The Commissioner of Taxation seeks summary judgment in two proceedings brought against him. The applicants in each proceeding are CLK Kitchens & Joinery Pty Ltd (CLK Kitchens) and its sole director, Clint Lucky Karananos. The proceedings seek judicial review of decisions and conduct of the Commissioner. The decisions and conduct relate to enforceable estimates of the liability of CLK Kitchens to remit amounts withheld under the Pay As You Go Withholding scheme (PAYGW amounts) to the Commissioner, and Director Penalty Notices (DPNs) issued to Mr Karananos in respect of the estimated amounts.

2 In the first proceeding, QUD 369 of 2017, the applicants impugn the Estimate Notice and DPNs issued by the Commissioner in July 2017. The second further amended originating application (2FAOA) seeks review of an array of “decisions” and related “conduct”. Despite the needlessly over-complicated approach adopted, the real complaints concern: the validity of the Commissioner’s decision to estimate CLK Kitchens’ liability to remit PAYGW amounts; whether a statutory declaration by Mr Karananos was effective (or required the Commissioner) to reduce or revoke the estimate; and whether the Commissioner was required to withdraw the DPNs.

3 The second proceeding, QUD 241 of 2018, seeks review of “decisions” and related “conduct” in March 2018, in relation to a reduction to the estimate the subject of the first proceeding. The further amended originating application (FAOA) in the second proceeding is also over-complicated, but turns on many of the same fundamental questions of the operation of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) (TAA).

4 CLK Kitchens and Mr Karananos will be referred to in these reason as the applicants, even...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1 cases
  • Fastbet Investments Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 5)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 9 Diciembre 2019
    ...Ltd v Commissioners of Works [1943] 2 All ER 560 Chang v Neill [2019] VSCA 151 CLK Kitchens & Joinery Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 1086 D’Amore v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2012] NSWSC 473 EHF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 168......