Cock v Aitken

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1912-1022 HCA A,[1911] HCA 72
Date1911
Year1911
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
1 books & journal articles
  • Book Review: Philip Ayres, The Miegunyah Press
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 31-2, June 2003
    • June 1, 2003
    ...eg, at 45.2 On Dixon's memory, see Philip Ayres, Owen Dixon (2003) 25–6. On his work ethic, see, eg,at 39, 47, 49, 65, 148, 260–1.3 (1911) 13 CLR 461. Dixon's argument is summarised in the report at 465–6. As Ayres notesin his account of Cock v Aitken, Dixon's brief in this matter came from......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT