Colgate Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Year1993
Date1993
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 firm's commentaries
  • Offers of compromise and Calderbank offers in the Supreme Court of Tasmania and costs ramifications
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 17 November 2012
    ...justify an order departing from the usual approach of the court: Safeway [22], Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 536; (1993) 46 FCR 225 at 233. If the justification for seeking indemnity costs or solicitor and client costs is non-acceptance of an offer of settlement, the par......
  • Property & Projects - What's News - 2 July 2014
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 6 July 2014
    ...Pty Ltd [2011] QCAT 120 Civic Steel Homes v Mitra [2006] QDC 322 Leo v Paulsen [2010] QCAT 122 Colgate Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 118 ALR 248. Love v Roads Corporation [2014] VSCA 129 APPEAL - Appeal limited to questions of law - Grounds in substance challenged findings of fact -......
1 books & journal articles
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 at 89–90, per Gaudron and Gummow JJ. See also Colgate Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 at 233–234, per Sheppard J; Chaina v Alvaro Homes Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 353 at [105]–[114], per Basten JA; Rapuano v Karydis-Frisan [2013]......