Colonial Sugar Refining Company Ltd v Attorney-General (Commonwealth)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1912-1022 HCA B,[1912] HCA 94
Date1912
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 cases
  • New South Wales v Commonwealth (No 2)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Crouch v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Boreham v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Djl v Central Authority
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 13 April 2000
    ...under s 74 of the Constitution granted by this Court in Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General for the Commonwealth (1912) 15 CLR 182 at 234 235. This set out the terms of a particular inter se question which was to be determined by the Privy 22 Reported, (1999) 24 Fam LR 623. 23......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • The Engineers Case Centenary: SCOTUS and the Origins of Australia's Scabrous Constitutional Signature
    • United Kingdom
    • British Journal of American Legal Studies No. 10-1, April 2021
    • 1 April 2021
    ...shall be reserved by the Governor-General for Her Majesty’s pleasure. 469 In Colonial Sugar Ref Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth) (1912) 15 CLR 182 (Austl.). 5 0 1900s 1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 10 Br. J. Am. Leg. Studies (2021) be kept in mind as possib......
  • Rights Review in the High Court and the Cultural Limits of Judicial Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 41-3, September 2013
    • 1 September 2013
    ...R v Barger (1908) 6 CLR 41. 113 Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330; Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v A-G (Cth) (1912) 15 CLR 182; Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v The King (1912) 15 CLR 65. 114 Galligan, Politics of the High Court, above n 8, 85–91. 115 Ibid 91. 116 Ibid 9......
  • A Century of Judicial Style: Changing Patterns in Judgment Writing on the High Court 1903–2001
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 32-2, June 2004
    • 1 June 2004
    ...should be granted'. The Court has only granted one certificate, for the case of Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth) (1912) 15 CLR 182; Attorney-General (Cth) v Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd [1914] AC 237 (PC). The reasoning of the Privy Council was widely regarded as un......
  • A Century of Judicial Style: Changing Patterns in Judgment Writing on the High Court 1903–2001
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 32-2, June 2004
    • 1 June 2004
    ...should be granted'. The Court has only granted one certificate, for the case of Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth) (1912) 15 CLR 182; Attorney-General (Cth) v Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd [1914] AC 237 (PC). The reasoning of the Privy Council was widely regarded as un......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT