Comcare v Martinez (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2013-0517 FCA G
Date2013
Year2013
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 cases
  • Onassys v Comcare
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 15 February 2022
    ...v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336 Chen v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2019] FCA 1155 Comcare v Martinez (No 2) [2013] FCA 439; (2013) 212 FCR 272 Comcare v Moon [2003] FCA 569 Darin v Olzomer [2012] NSWCA 60 Delis v Tax Practitioners Board [2016] FCA 570 Djokovic v ......
  • Comcare v Stewart (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 23 April 2019
    ...whether the meeting occurred in a “reasonable manner”, not whether it could have occurred “more reasonably”: Comcare v Martinez (No 2) (2013) 212 FCR 272 (Robertson 3. On remitter to the Tribunal, Mr Stewart and Comcare will enter into the following consent terms of agreement under s 42C of......
  • Comcare v Stewart
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 21 March 2019
    ...s 5A Cases cited: Comcare v Drinkwater [2018] FCAFC 62; 158 ALD 244 Comcare v Martin [2016] HCA 43; 258 CLR 467 Comcare v Martinez (No 2) [2013] FCA 439; 212 FCR 272 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Reeve [2012] FCAFC 21; 199 FCR 463 Drenth and Comcare [2011] AATA 582 Keen v Workers Rehabil......
  • Northern Territory of Australia v Yao
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 14 February 2025
    ...in a reasonable manner Christou v Minister for Health [2008] WASCA 214; Comcare v Martin (2016) 258 CLR 467; Comcare v Martinez (No 2) [2013] FCA 439; Department of Education v Sinclair [2005] NSWCA 465; Devasahayum and Comcare [2010] AATA 785; Georges and Telstra Corporation Limited [2009]......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Judicial Review and Merits Review: Are the Boundaries Being Eroded?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 45-4, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...103 ATR 280, 299 [57]. 114 Osland v Secretary, Department of Justice (2010) 241 CLR 320, 332 [19] (French CJ, Gummow and Bell JJ). 115 (2013) 212 FCR 272, 295 [88]. 640 Federal Law Review Volume 45 _____________________________________________________________________________________ IV ERRO......