Commonwealth v Baume

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1905] HCA 11
Date1905
Year1905
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
70 cases
4 books & journal articles
  • PROPORTIONALITY UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2019 (QLD): WHEN ARE THE FACTORS IN S. 13(2) NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT, AND WHEN ARE THEY NOT?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 2, April 2022
    • 1 April 2022
    ...in determining comparable principle. (141) McCloy (n 57) 213 [68] (French CJ, Kiefel, Bell and Keane JJ). (142) Commonwealth v Baume (1905) 2 CLR 405, 414 (Griffith CJ); Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, 382 [71] (McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ......
  • A Step Too Far? Rethinking the Stepping Stone Approach to Officers’ Liability
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 47-1, March 2019
    • 1 March 2019
    ...Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355, 381–2 [69]–[70] (McHugh, Gummow,Kirby and Hayne JJ) (‘Project Blue Sky’).147. Commonwealth v Baume (1905) 2 CLR 405, 414 (Griffith CJ); Project Blue Sky (1998) 194 CLR 355,382 [71] (McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ).148. Maxwell (2006) 59 ACSR 373, 402 [110].......
  • Gone but not Forgotten: In Defence of Hickman
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 46-2, June 2018
    • 1 June 2018
    ...and shades of meaning and nuance’ in the language of 76 Project Blue Sky (1998) 194 CLR 355, 382, quoting Commonwealth v Baume (1905) 2 CLR 405, 414; see also O’Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 232, 273–4 in which Brennan J made a similar argument. 77 Lacey v A-G (Qld) (2011) 24......
  • TRICKED INTO MARRIAGE.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 1, August 2018
    • 1 August 2018
    ...[A] court construing a statutory provision must strive to give meaning to every word of the provision. In The Commonwealth v Baume [(1905) 2 CLR 405, 414] Griffith CJ cited R v Berchet [(1688) 1 Show KB 106; 89 ER 480] to support the proposition that it was 'a known rule in the interpretati......