Commonwealth v Bogle

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1953] HCA 10,1953-0313 HCA A
Date1953
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • Minister for Arts Heritage v Peko-Wallsend Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 7 Septiembre 1987
    ...the Northern Territory cannot bind the Crown in right of the Commonwealth. As Fullagar J said in Commonwealth of Australia v BogleUNK (1953) 89 CLR 229 at 259–60: ‘The Commonwealth—or the Crown in right of the Commonwealth, or whatever you choose to call it—is, to all intents and purposes, ......
  • Spence v Queensland
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 Mayo 2019
    ...National Airways Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (1945) 71 CLR 29 at 85; [1945] HCA 41. 136 (1947) 74 CLR 508 at 530; [1947] HCA 45. 137 (1953) 89 CLR 229 at 259; [1953] HCA 10. 138 (1997) 190 CLR 410 at 440, 443–444. See also at 509. 139 See Doyle, “1947 Revisited: The Immunity of the Commonwea......
  • Commonwealth v Western Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Re Mercantile Mutual Life Insurance Company Ltd v Asc
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
  • Federal Limitations on the Legislative Power of the States and the Commonwealth to Bind One Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 31-3, September 2003
    • 1 Septiembre 2003
    ...the law does not 'bind' the Commonwealth but rather 'affects' it by regulating transactions that it enters into: Commonwealth v Bogle (1953) 89 CLR 229, 259 (Fullagar J), referring to Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Official Liquidator of E O Farley Ltd (1940) 63 CLR 278, 308 (Dixon J); ......
  • The Legal Personality of the Commonwealth of Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 47-1, March 2019
    • 1 Marzo 2019
    ...J); R v Sutton (1908) 5CLR 789, 797 (Griffith CJ), 805 (O’Connor J), 813 (Isaacs J) (‘Wire Netting Case’); Commonwealth vBogle (1953) 89 CLR 229, 259 (Fullagar J); South Australia v Commonwealth (1962) 108 CLR 130, 154(Windeyer J) (‘Railway Standardisation Case’); Williams v Commonwealth (2......
  • Commonwealth Immunity as a Constitutional Implication
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 29-2, June 2001
    • 1 Junio 2001
    ...persons or bodies who derived their_____________________________________________________________________________________42 Ibid 377.43 (1953) 89 CLR 229 ('Bogle').44 The case was concerned with whether an increase in accommodation charges at aCommonwealth migrant hostel violated the Victori......
  • INSTITUTIONAL ADAPTATION AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 No. 3, April 2021
    • 1 Abril 2021
    ...whose rights were safeguarded by the general law: at 71 [26] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh and Hayne JJ). But see Commonwealth v Bogle (1953) 89 CLR 229, 256 (Webb J), 267 (Fullagar J, Dixon CJ agreeing at 249, Kitto J agreeing at 274), in which a majority of the Court held that the Commonwe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT