Commonwealth v Hospital Contribution Fund of Australia

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1982-0511 HCA B,[1982] HCA 13
Date1982
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
60 cases
  • Re Kwiatek; ex parte Big J Ltd v Pattison
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Couch v The Attorney-General
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 24 March 2010
    ...Commonwealth of Australia (1989) 166 CLR 417 at 438. 152 The Commonwealth of Australia v The Hospital Contribution Fund of Australia (1982) 150 CLR 49 at 56–58. 153 Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 (HL) at 1226 (oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional action by the servants of the governm......
  • Re Patterson; ex parte Taylor
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 6 September 2001
    ...Queensland v The Commonwealth (1977) 139 CLR 585 at 599 per Gibbs J, 630 per Aickin J; The Commonwealth v Hospital Contribution Fund (1982) 150 CLR 49 at 56 per Gibbs CJ; John v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 166 CLR 417 at 438 per Mason CJ, Wilson, Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron 29 (1......
  • North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency Ltd v Northern Territory
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 November 2015
    ...[198], 655 [219]. 150 Harris v Caladine (1991) 172 CLR 84 at 92; [1991] HCA 9, explaining The Commonwealth v Hospital Contribution Fund (1982) 150 CLR 49; [1982] HCA 151 (2006) 228 CLR 45 at 76 [63]; [2006] HCA 44. 152 (2006) 228 CLR 45 at 76 [64]. 153Attorney-General (NT) v Emmerson (2014)......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 books & journal articles
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 40-1, March 2012
    • 1 March 2012
    ...78 See, eg, Leeth v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR 455, 468–9 (Mason CJ, Dawson and McHugh JJ); Commonwealth v Hospital Contribution Fund (1982) 150 CLR 49, 61 (Mason J); Le Mesurier v Connor (1929) 42 CLR 481, 495–6 (Knox CJ, Rich and Dixon JJ); Federated Sawmill, Timberyard and General Woodw......
  • The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...relatively few and their impact cannot to be overstated. 132 Kotsis v Kotsis (1970) 122 CLR 69; Knight v Knight (1971) 122 CLR 114. 133 (1982) 150 CLR 49 (‘Hospital Contribution Fund’). 134 Kotsis v Kotsis (1970) 122 CLR 69, 110. 135 (1982) 150 CLR 49, 62. 136 Ibid. 137 (1991) 172 CLR 84. 1......
  • Terms of Convenience: Examining Constitutional Overrulings by the High Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-1, March 2003
    • 1 March 2003
    ...461, 489.38 Ibid 518–9.39 (1997) 190 CLR 513 ('Newcrest').40 Ibid 613.41 (1969) 119 CLR 564 ('Teori Tau').42 (1989) 168 CLR 461, 519.43 (1982) 150 CLR 49 ('Hospital Contribution Fund (No 2003 Terms of Convenience 173____________________ ______________________ ______________________ ________......
  • SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION:
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...v Kotsis(1970) 122 CLR 69, applied in Knight v Knight(1971) 122 CLR 114. 34Commonwealth v Hospital Contribution Fund of Australia(1982) 150 CLR 49. 35Harris v Calladine(1991) 172 CLR 84. 36Harris v Calladine(1991) 172 CLR 84 at 95. 37 See Precision Data Holdings Ltd v Wills(1991) 173 CLR 16......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT