Commonwealth v Hospital Contribution Fund of Australia

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation1982-0511 HCA B,[1982] HCA 13
Date1982
Year1982

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
60 cases
  • Re Kwiatek; ex parte Big J Ltd v Pattison
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Couch v The Attorney-General
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 24 March 2010
    ...Commonwealth of Australia (1989) 166 CLR 417 at 438. 152 The Commonwealth of Australia v The Hospital Contribution Fund of Australia (1982) 150 CLR 49 at 56–58. 153 Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 (HL) at 1226 (oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional action by the servants of the governm......
  • Couch v The
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 24 March 2010
    ...categories to be found in Rookes v Barnard153 but 152 153 The Commonwealth of Australia v The Hospital Contribution Fund of Australia (1982) 150 CLR 49 at Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 (HL) at 1226 (oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional action by the servants of the government). The N......
  • Shaw v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 December 2003
    ...particular reference to the adoption in John v Federal Commissioner of Taxation48 of what had been said by Gibbs CJ in The Commonwealth v Hospital Contribution Fund49. 39 The decision in Patterson does not rest upon a principle carefully worked out in a significant succession of decisions; ......
  • Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
  • The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...relatively few and their impact cannot to be overstated. 132 Kotsis v Kotsis (1970) 122 CLR 69; Knight v Knight (1971) 122 CLR 114. 133 (1982) 150 CLR 49 (‘Hospital Contribution Fund’). 134 Kotsis v Kotsis (1970) 122 CLR 69, 110. 135 (1982) 150 CLR 49, 62. 136 Ibid. 137 (1991) 172 CLR 84. 1......
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 40-1, March 2012
    • 1 March 2012
    ...78 See, eg, Leeth v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR 455, 468–9 (Mason CJ, Dawson and McHugh JJ); Commonwealth v Hospital Contribution Fund (1982) 150 CLR 49, 61 (Mason J); Le Mesurier v Connor (1929) 42 CLR 481, 495–6 (Knox CJ, Rich and Dixon JJ); Federated Sawmill, Timberyard and General Woodw......
  • Terms of Convenience: Examining Constitutional Overrulings by the High Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-1, March 2003
    • 1 March 2003
    ...461, 489.38 Ibid 518–9.39 (1997) 190 CLR 513 ('Newcrest').40 Ibid 613.41 (1969) 119 CLR 564 ('Teori Tau').42 (1989) 168 CLR 461, 519.43 (1982) 150 CLR 49 ('Hospital Contribution Fund (No 2003 Terms of Convenience 173____________________ ______________________ ______________________ ________......
  • SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION:
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...v Kotsis(1970) 122 CLR 69, applied in Knight v Knight(1971) 122 CLR 114. 34Commonwealth v Hospital Contribution Fund of Australia(1982) 150 CLR 49. 35Harris v Calladine(1991) 172 CLR 84. 36Harris v Calladine(1991) 172 CLR 84 at 95. 37 See Precision Data Holdings Ltd v Wills(1991) 173 CLR 16......
  • Get Started for Free