Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeGummow ACJ,Kirby,Crennan JJ,Hayne J,Callinan J
Judgment Date06 December 2006
Neutral Citation2006-1206 HCA A,[2006] HCA 55
Docket NumberS54/2006
Date06 December 2006
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
145 cases
4 firm's commentaries
  • Implied Licences And Copyright In Architect’s Plans: Is There A Concrete Explanation?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 19 July 2007
    ...decisive answer to this question can be found in the High Court decision Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 55 (6 December An architect (or his or her employer), who creates plans owns the copyright in them, whether or not the architect has been paid ......
  • Where next for New Acland coal mine Stage 3 expansion project?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 2 October 2019
    ...Ltd & Ors [2019] QCA 184. 2 At [61], citing Kirby and Crennan JJ in Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 577; [2006] HCA 55, and Antoun v The Queen (2006) 80 ALJR 497; [2006] HCA 3 At [103]. The content of this article is intended to provide a g......
  • Can You Patent A Building? You Can Bet Your House On It?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 October 2007
    ...decided a case that involved the issue of copyright in architectural plans (Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design Developments Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 55). Copyright however is not the only form of intellectual property protection upon which those in the architectural, building and construction i......
  • Intellectual Property in building plans and development approvals: who owns the copyright?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 24 September 2019
    ...FCAFC 65. 2 Gruzman Pty Ltd v Percy Marks Pty Ltd (1989) 16 IPR 87. 3 Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design and Developments Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 55. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific...
2 books & journal articles
  • Apprehended Bias in Australian Administrative Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 38-3, September 2010
    • 1 September 2010
    ...Tribunal; Ex parte H (2001) 179 ALR 425, 434 [27] ('Ex Parte H'); Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Limited (2006) 229 CLR 577 ('Concrete Pty Ltd'), 609 [110]; McGovern v Ku-ring-gai Council (2008) 72 NSWLR 504 ('McGovern'); Weinstein v Medical Practitioners Board of V......
  • CLARITY AND COMPLEXITY IN THE BIAS RULE.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 Nbr. 2, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...at earlier stages of a case did not create an apprehension of bias: Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 577, 634-5 [174]-[175] (Callinan J) (110) Johnson (n 23) 493 [13] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ). Justices Gordon and Edelma......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT