O'Connor v Setka

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date06 April 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCA 441
CourtFederal Court
Date06 April 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Menon, in the matter of an election for offices of the Manufacturing Division of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • October 18, 2021
    ...making findings which did not turn solely on the proper construction of the Rules of the Union. The primary judge in O’Connor v Setka [2020] FCA 441 at [128]-[129] held that National Rule 42(iii)(c) was to be construed as meaning that all members of the Union not employed in or in connectio......
  • Menon, in the matter of an election for offices of the Manufacturing Division of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • June 8, 2021
    ...office in the Victorian No 1 Branch of the Health Services Union (No 2) [2012] FCA 1243 Clancy, Re ANMF [2017] FCA 460 O’Connor v Setka [2020] FCA 441 Application of the Electoral Commissioner (2014) 226 FCR 144; [2014] FCA 588 Re Jarman; Ex parte Cook (No 2) (1996) 136 ALR 233; [1996] HCA ......
  • O'Connor v Setka
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • November 11, 2020
    ...font-weight: bold } a:link { color: #0000ff } Federal Court of Australia O’Connor v Setka [2020] FCAFC 195 Appeal from: O’Connor v Setka [2020] FCA 441 File number: VID 263 of 2020 Judgment of: MORTIMER, RANGIAH AND WHITE JJ Date of judgment: 11 November 2020 Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – ap......
  • O'Connor v Setka (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • March 2, 2022
    ...10 ACTR 65 Kelly v Noonan [2021] FCA 146 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Wang (2003) 215 CLR 518 O’Connor v Setka [2020] FCA 441 O’Connor v Setka [2020] FCAFC 195 R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Barrett (1945) 70 CLR 141 R v Joske; Ex pa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT