Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date17 July 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCAFC 122
Date17 July 2020
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 122


Appeal from:

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd[2019] FCA 1806



File number:

WAD 584 of 2019



Judges:

ALLSOP CJ, JAGOT AND LEE JJ



Date of judgment:

17 July 2020



Catchwords:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – employee-independent contractor dichotomy – too deeply rooted to be pulled out – labour hire agency – “Odco” style arrangement – multi-factorial approach to characterisation – an intuitive exercise – evaluative assessment – need make an informed, considered qualitative appreciation of the whole – not a checklist exercise – proper role of contract tensions in the application of the multi-factorial approach to new and novel labour arrangements – application of the control indicium to trilateral relationships – weight to be given to whether the putative employee is carrying on a business on their own account – preference for substance over form – employment as a relationship particularly susceptible to contractual obfuscation – need to ascertain the status of the worker – standard form contract provided to the worker on a take-it-or-leave-it basis – potential to revisit the legitimacy of the “Odco” style arrangement


HIGH COURT AND FEDERAL COURT – the need for coherence in Australia’s single common law – comity to be given to the decision of another intermediate appellate Court – Farah Constructions Pty Limited v Say-Dee Pty Limited[2007] HCA 22; (2007) 230 CLR 89circumstances where a materially identical arrangement was found to be valid by the Western Australian Industrial Appeals Court in 2004 – Court should not depart from earlier decision in circumstances to distinguish current arrangement would also be artificial


CONTRACT – impact of a contract incorporating statutory health and safety obligations – unsound to deconstruct a contract and render non-contractual any term which substantially encapsulates a statutory obligation – need to look to the totality of the relationship, which includes documents which are not contractual in nature



Legislation:

Building and Construction General On-Site Award 2010

Employment Rights Act1996 (UK) s 230

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 15, 545, 546, 547

Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) ss 85, 90, 96K

Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 (WA) ss 19, 20, 23F



Cases cited:

ACE Insurance Ltd v Trifunovski[2011] FCA 1204; (2011) 200 FCR 532

ACE Insurance Ltd v Trifunovski [2013] FCAFC 3; (2013) 209 FCR 146

Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Moroccanoil Israel Ltd [2018] FCAFC 93; (2018) 261 FCR 301

Amita Gupta v Portier Pacific Pty Ltd; Uber Australia Pty Ltd t/a Uber Eats[2020] FWCFB 1698

Articulate Restorations and Development Pty Limited v Crawford (1994) 57 IR 371

Attorney-General for New South Wales v Perpetual Trustee Company (Limited)[1952] HCA 2; (1952) 85 CLR 237

Australian Mutual Provident Society v Chaplin (1978) 18 ALR 385

Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher[2011] UKSC 41; [2011] 4 All ER 745

Bain v Central Vermont Railway Co[1921] 2 AC 412

Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd[2001] FCA 1833; (2001) 117 FCR 424

Building Workers’ Industrial Union of Australia v Odco Pty Ltd[1991] FCA 96; (1991) 29 FCR 104

C v Commonwealth [2015] FCAFC 113; (2015) 234 FCR 81

Cameron v Nystrom[1893] AC 308

Capital Aircraft Services Pty Ltd v Brolin [2007] ACTCA 8

Century Insurance Co v Northern Ireland Road Transport Board[1942] AC 509

Codelfa Construction Proprietary Ltdv State Rail Authority of New South Wales [1982] HCA 24; (1982) 149 CLR 337

Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Limited v Producers and Citizens Co-operative Assurance Company of Australia Limited [1931] HCA 53; (1931) 46 CLR 41

Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Barrett[1973] HCA 49; (1973) 129 CLR 395

Connelly v Wells (1994) 55 IR 73

Consistent Group Ltd v Kalwak [2007] IRLR 560

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd[2019] FCA 1806

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union of Workers v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd trading as Tricord Personnel [2004] WAIRComm 11445; [2004] 84 WAIG 1275

Country Metropolitan Agency Contracting Services Pty Ltd v Slater [2003] SAWCT 57; (2003) 124 IR 293

Crown Resorts Ltd v Zantran Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 1; (2020) 374 ALR 739

Damevski v Giudice[2003] FCAFC 252; (2003) 133 FCR 438

Day v Ocean Beach Hotel Shellharbour Pty Ltd[2013] NSWCA 250; (2013) 85 NSWLR 335

Deatons Proprietary Limited v Flew [1949] HCA 60; (1949) 79 CLR 370

Denham v Midland Employers Mutual Assurance Ltd[1955] 2 QB 437

Dental Corporation Pty Ltd v Moffet[2020] FCAFC 118

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Bolwell (1967) 1 ATR 862

Drake Personnel Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue[2000] VSCA 112; (2000) 2 VR 635

Ellis v Wallsend District Hospital(1989) 17 NSWLR 553

Fair Work Ombudsman v Contracting Solutions Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 7

Fair Work Ombudsman v Ecosway Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 296

Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth Holdings Pty Ltd[2015] FCAFC 37; (2015) 228 FCR 346

Fair Work Ombudsman v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd[2011] FCA 1176; (2011) 198 FCR 174

Fajloun v Khoury[2016] NSWCA 101

Farah Constructions Pty Limited v Say-Dee Pty Limited[2007] HCA 22; (2007) 230 CLR 89

Forstaff Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue[2004] NSWSC 573; (2004) 144 IR 1

Gett v Tabet[2009] NSWCA 76; (2009) 254 ALR 504

Goldman Sachs JBWere Services Pty Ltd v Nikolich[2007] FCAFC 120

Gramotnev v Queensland University of Technology [2015] QCA 127; (2015) 251 IR 448

Hall (Inspector of Taxes) v Lorimer [1992] 1 WLR 939

Hasler v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 226; (2014) 311 ALR 494

Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd[2001] HCA 4; (2001) 207 CLR 21

Humberstone v Northern Timber Mills [1949] HCA 49; (1949) 79 CLR 389

J A & B M Bowden & Sons Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2001] NSWCA 125; (2001) 105 IR 66

Jamsek v ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 1934

Jensen v Cultural Infusion (Int) Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 358

Johnson v Lindsay & Co[1891] AC 371

Johnson v MNG Investments t/as Australian Temporary Fencing [2011] ACTSC 124

Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales[2010] HCA 1; (2010) 239 CLR 531

Lancaster v Greaves (1829) 9 B & C 627

Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation[1997] HCA 25; (1997) 189 CLR 520

Lipohar v The Queen[1999] HCA 65; (1999) 200 CLR 485

Lopez v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCAFC 157; (2005) 143 FCR 574

Marshall v Whittaker’s Building Supply Company[1963] HCA 26; (1963) 109 CLR 210

Massey v Crown Life Insurance Co [1978] 1 WLR 678

McDonald v Commonwealth (1945) 46 SR (NSW) 129

Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins & Griffith (Liverpool) Ltd[1947] AC 1

Narich Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Pay-Roll Tax [1983] 2 NSWLR 597

National...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 cases
7 firm's commentaries
  • Independent Contractors ' how will the High Court approach the issue?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 23 Diciembre 2021
    ...least. Footnotes 1Which looks to appeal Jamsek v ZG Operations [2020] FCAFC 119 2 Which looks to appeal CFMEU v Personnel Contracting [2020] FCAFC 122 3 Workpac Pyt Ltd v Rossato & ORS [2021] HCA 23 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Sp......
  • Independent Contractors ' how will the High Court approach the issue?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 23 Diciembre 2021
    ...least. Footnotes 1Which looks to appeal Jamsek v ZG Operations [2020] FCAFC 119 2 Which looks to appeal CFMEU v Personnel Contracting [2020] FCAFC 122 3 Workpac Pyt Ltd v Rossato & ORS [2021] HCA 23 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Sp......
  • Latest clarity on casual v permanent employees
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 7 Septiembre 2021
    ...Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 119 (Jamsek); and, Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 122 (Personnel Contracting). If the High Court in those matters was so minded following the Rossato principles, then the initial contractual terms a......
  • Latest clarity on casual v permanent employees
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 7 Septiembre 2021
    ...Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 119 (Jamsek); and, Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 122 (Personnel Contracting). If the High Court in those matters was so minded following the Rossato principles, then the initial contractual terms a......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • JUDGING THE EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF WORKERS: AN ANALYSIS OF COMMONSENSE REASONING.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 46 No. 1, December 2022
    • 1 Diciembre 2022
    ...20(2) Feminist Legal Studies 135, 140. (80) See, eg, Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting (2020) 279 FCR 631, 666 [117] (Lee J) ('Personnel Contracting (Full Federal Court)'). See below nn 132-53 and accompanying (81) Hunter, 'The Power of Femini......